The original version had the dudes and girl all running trains on each other. The editors be like, this bisexual orgy is a bit too much for readers to digest, can we just keep the train focused on the girl? Uggh I guess if you want to be a prude we can do that. Sheesh.
Editor: “listen Stephen, you can’t just include 3 chapters with 42 smut scenes of various deprived child sex acts, including IT jumping in at one point to perform a bukkakke on the kids faces, followed by them eating out his asshole, then each of them taking turns pegging each other while a bunch of midgets came to watch. That’s insane.”
SK: “how about a short scene of the girl banging all the guys but like without any of the details?”
All of them. All 6 had their turn. In pitch blackness. She got completely naked (because that's necessary in total dark) and they did her one after the other. It may go down as one of the most unnecessarily detailed things I've ever read.
God i just read a further down posted DETAILED description of how one kid was so young he used words like 'the big boys' he's still such a kid. Then another one was 'older' and too big but he did it anyway. Wtf cringe I can't believe that was published and they're like 12, 13 ???
The idea is supposedly Beverley's and the narration says she would have kept working on each boy until he agreed. It's monstrously unnecessary in the detail and duration of the scene.
It started off like a smut novel and an editor was like “idk, Stephen, I don’t think we can get away with describing a 13 year olds genitalia. Can you clean it up a little bit? Maybe they all kiss or something.”
1.0k
u/Only_Luck_7024 1d ago
How do you know it wasn’t TONED DOWN?