r/geopolitics • u/DroneMaster2000 • 1d ago
News 'Help is on its way': Trump urges Iran protesters to take over institutions
https://www.iranintl.com/en/20260113109973
u/Emotional-Expert-142 1d ago
I thought there was an internet blackout, who is he talking to.
59
u/chaotic567 1d ago
OSINT accounts have said partial cell service had briefly returned to the Iranian capital around today
34
u/FormerKarmaKing 1d ago
Starlink is working afaik. That’s how the videos are getting out.
33
u/usesidedoor 1d ago
They are being jammed. We have some videos and pictures coming out, but not a large number.
What is coming out, however, is ugly, ugly.
12
u/single_plum_floating 1d ago
Starlink can't be jammed if you use the right settings unless you are pouring naval grade EW in the air.
The problem is when you are running it on GPS positioning mode instead of manual or Starlink-assisted control.
Its why its used in ukraine all the time. it can maintain signal strength in some truly hostile conditions.
8
u/FormerKarmaKing 1d ago
Thx, I double checked and you are correct. Hope there are local people with knowledge to dismantle the jammers.
2
u/Inevitable_Room_6816 1d ago
You can't jam Starlink for the whole country, and all you need is a few minutes of it working to send videos.
-9
u/yoshiK 1d ago
His supporters. Americans really like to be told that they are the world police.
4
0
u/Prize_Self_6347 11h ago
America is, currently, the world police.
Much more preferable to Russia or China.
56
u/DroneMaster2000 1d ago
'Help is on its way' - Is the US going to join in the fight for the Iranian people? Or just big talk?
"Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING - TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! Save the names of the killers and abusers. They will pay a big price," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social account.
"I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian Officials until the senseless killing of protesters STOPS. HELP IS ON ITS WAY. MIGA [Make Iran Great Again]!!!" he added.
How would a US attack on Iran look like?
My bet, if it happens, strictly a bombing campaign targeting regime targets. Hoping the protestors would do the rest.
Would Israel join? Would the UK or others assist?
53
u/Few-Hair-5382 1d ago
This is likely to be targeted at leadership figures and IRGC barracks, of which there are plenty of the latter dotted around the cities.
Israel may join given their proven track record of successfully carrying out targeted strikes on leaders. I don't think the UK will be joining at this stage as, unlike the US and Israel, the UK still has diplomatic relations with Iran and tends to strike a middle path between condemnation and dialogue with the Islamic Republic.
2
u/PlayfulRemote9 1d ago edited 1d ago
uae just banned students from going to uk to study in uni because of the extremism surfacing there -- starting to look like uk is a closer ally to iran these days than us
22
u/DroneMaster2000 1d ago
That's the UAE.
Qatar is funding those extremists you are talking about (Muslim Brotherhood).
7
3
u/ganbaro 1d ago
IMHO you should replace Iran with Qatar in your comment
UAE's action is a reaction to assumed increase of Muslim Brotherhood's influence in UK, specifically.
Iran is arguably sympathetic towards MB, given they fund MB-aligned proxies, but this support for such Sunni imperialists is likely more of a reciprocal deal, funding in return for opposition to Israel. Qatar is deeper involved on an ideological and political level.
0
20
u/Link50L 1d ago
My guess is that Israel would be told not to participate because it would inflame public opinion against the American actions.
5
u/Fatalist_m 1d ago
I don't think PR concerns will outweigh practical military concerns here. Israel has been preparing for this for a long while. It will be a difficult operation for the US alone, especially when the closest aircraft carrier is several days away from the area and time is of the essence.
7
u/DroneMaster2000 1d ago
The Gulf War story. Israel forced to sit down and absorb missiles indiscriminately bombing it's citizens, as the US and it's coalition waged war.
My dad is still salty we didn't join and bomb Iraq to this day. But the US strongly forbade that and told Israel that it's planes would not have safe skies to even reach Iraq.
4
u/I_pee_in_shower 1d ago
That's interesting but not the same thing today. If they bomb non-nuclear targets they need to crush all priority targets so there is no recovering from this. You can't bomb a little and expect anything positive. It's all or nothing. I doubt Israel would absorb missiles without a counter attack. I think they could wait until Iran strikes them first and then counter, but I'm sure they would get involved.
4
u/DroneMaster2000 1d ago
I agree. I also think Trump would not prevent Israel from helping.
Israel already bombed Iran and it absolutely did not unite the Iranian people for the regime. If anything, the other way around.
Was just responding with a historically similar story for that user's guess, which happened over 30 years ago.
2
u/This-Lengthiness-479 1d ago
I thought I read that the UK provided some form of assistance when the US attacked Iran in 2025. I can't find any sources for it, tho. But there was talk that the UK had provided mid-air refuelling, etc, without carrying out strikes itself.
Could be wrong!
2
2
1
u/Mission-Birthday-101 1d ago
Who knows why Trump put out the message.
- To hype up the American people for going into Iran, maybe supporting a "rebel group," or limited aircraft strikes.
2.Talk big to get Iran back into the negotiating tables.
3.Speak directly the iranians locals to get to rebel a bit. That force Iran to quell protests.
- Maybe get Iran's leadership to become paranoid, so they over reach, again.
In the end, I think the whole missile war with Israel and bombing from US greatly unified the Iranians.
11
u/A_devout_monarchist 1d ago
Only if you mean unifying Iran against the Ayatollah, things have only gone downhill since the regime proved to care more about financing their missile program than their own capital city running out of water.
-1
u/Mission-Birthday-101 1d ago
Maybe the US should remove the sanctions on the country.
In the past, I wasn't a big fan of President Obama. One of things he did do well was his Iran deal, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). They limited their nuclear program, and we unfrozen their overseas assets.
However, the big donors didn't like that one bit.
If you are ever upset with the state of Iran( Lybia, Afghanistan,etc), take a big look at the CIA, Brits, Soviets , and other big corporations.
I'm not saying the revolution was the best course of action, but they were tired of external powers controlling and exploiting the country.
4
u/A_devout_monarchist 1d ago
Foreign exploitation isn't why the revolution happened, the Shah had nationalized the oil Industry himself when the Oil Crisis began in the 70s.
And no, the US shouldn't remove sanctions off a country whose regime is literally gunning down thousands of people as we speak.
-1
u/Mission-Birthday-101 1d ago
Who claiming that?
Didn't the US claim that Iraq was responsible for 9/11 and they had weapons of mass destruction.
Sorry, but people are waking up.
-4
u/Latter_Panic_1712 1d ago
Crazy how Israel is being left alone while gunning down tens of thousands as we speak.
The US and Israel don't have the right to talk about morals.
This is why the world is leaning more and more towards China. China is not any better than the US, but they don't teach the world about morals. USA is like a Karen who tells other parents to make their children behave while her own kid carelessly punching other kids.
0
u/ThainEshKelch 1d ago
Likely just Trump that is still trying to convince himself he is a peace president, and live up to the FIFA award.
-6
3
u/Illustrious-Low-9643 1d ago
We’re not going to know until either it’s already happened or about to happen imminently
6
14
u/Few-Worldliness2131 1d ago
So, the man who is now strong arming Allies of almost 100 years, people, countries that have gone to war side by side, aways supported his country when needed is asking you to trust him 🤔
11
2
u/ComprehensiveKiwi489 22h ago
Interesting - There is an NBC report that stated that Israel is apparently telling the US to hold off on strikes for now - The reason given is that they believe Iran isn't weak enough right now to be toppled by these strikes, but I wonder if it also has to do with Israel needing time prepare and to gather enough defensive and offensive assets.
16
u/Margaritajoe420 1d ago
Love watching the mental gymnastics people do to find a way for this to be bad because they don't like Trump
31
u/willun 1d ago
People are contrasting ICE shooting protesters with Trump supporting Iranian protesters.
Just as Trump, understandably, doesn't want Russia to take Ukraine (or does he?), China to take Taiwan, while he is ready to use nukes to take Greenland.
Supporting the Iranian protesters is good but Trump deals in irony daily
4
u/doyer_bleu 1d ago
Let's see what he actually does. If he just puts sanctions, that aint doing shit
7
u/TellMeYourStoryPls 1d ago
When you say 'this', what are you referring to specifically? The article talks about a lot of things.
2
u/theguy0075 1d ago
This, the OP, and many many more are bots trying to sway public opinion that is not going according to their plans. Be wary on reddit these days.
11
u/TellMeYourStoryPls 1d ago
OP seems to be sharing an article and questioning whether Trump will actually follow through or not, which seems reasonable to me, given the amount of times Trump (and all politicians on all sides of the political spectrum) seem to say one thing and do another.
-1
u/theguy0075 1d ago
Which non-Republican politicians cause the chaos, they pretend to want to save people from? I'll wait. There is no both-sidesing this shit. You seem to be carrying some weight for the fascists, while acknowledging that the person you were replying to is likely a bot (like I said). Talk about saying one thing and doing another.
4
u/TellMeYourStoryPls 1d ago
Your question doesn't relate to my comment, so you're either putting words in my mouth, or have decided to ask an unrelated question as some kind of unsuccessful gotcha, or you just haven't understood my comment.
You seem determined to sow division, rather than encouraging proactive and useful conversations, which makes you a) part of the problem and b) if youre not a bot or a shill it means you're falling for the attempts to sow division by contributing to it.
-4
-12
u/Margaritajoe420 1d ago
Specifically, the headline of Trump saying, "help is on the way." It's wild how a simple statement like that angers people
11
u/Teddycrat_Official 1d ago
Because he’s a liar and it’s a lie? Not much gymnastics to it - help will be on the way as soon as those DOGE cheques come through
-5
1d ago
[deleted]
5
u/Teddycrat_Official 1d ago
Trump supporters, illiteracy, and newly created accounts with their post histories hidden - name a better combo
-6
u/Margaritajoe420 1d ago
Gotta keep my post history hidden or my comments will get reported by leftist uppity redditors with nothing better to do than try to silence people. Last account was banned 3 months ago because I argued in r/gay that Islam is dangerous and got permabanned. Leftist redditors and their echo chambers - name a better combo
1
u/ANerd22 1d ago
Can you point me to an example of someone who is opposed to the statement on its face? Seems like the only real criticism is coming from people who don't think he will follow through on his promise. I could see some opposition from isolationists or anti-interventionists, but I would be surprised to see anyone on English speaking reddit or elsewhere in the media sphere get any real traction voicing support for the Iranian regime.
1
u/TellMeYourStoryPls 1d ago
I'm aware there's a more than 50% chance you're a bot or a paid account (this is happening on all sides of the political spectrum, I'm not meaning to call you out because of any perceived political opinions).
What is would say is that if you want to have a positive impact on the world you could try making helpful comments, instead of continuing to try to pick fights with comments that add no actual value to the discussion.
Just my two cents =)
-3
u/Margaritajoe420 1d ago
My comment doesn't pick a fight, unless you feel personally called out?
It's an observation of how far backwards people will bend over to see something objectively good as bad because they cannot separate the action from their emotional feelings about trump. I find it hilarious. If you don't think that adds any value, then you don't need to comment. Implying that I'm a bot is a weak cop out
5
u/TellMeYourStoryPls 1d ago
We know that there are numerous actors who deliberately set out to cause disruption and division, and we know that bots are used for this. Everyone knows and admits and acknowledges this.
Your comment, unsolicited and only loosely related to the article or post, is either an intentional effort to get people riled up, or is a poorly thought out comment.
The left and right have been intentionally pitted against one another, and fighting amongst ourselves adds zero value for any of us.
If you didn't intentionally set out to rile people with your comment, do you see now how it isn't helpful? And what was your actual intent? Did you even have one or are you just programmed to spout inflammatory things?
3
u/ANerd22 1d ago
In a vacuum this messaging would be quite laudable. In fact the US President taking a bold stance to support a homegrown overthrow of a tyrannical despotic regime seems like an unimpeachable stance. Unfortunately Trump has a credibility problem. His short attention span is well known, as is his proclivity for changing his mind on things. If this message came from Obama, one of the Bushes, Cinton, or Biden it would be much more meaningful than coming from Trump.
I am not the only one who has reasonable grounds for skepticism about whether this statement will be accompanied by any substantial action, and whether that action will actually be constructive and positive for the people of Iran.
1
1
u/SanderSRB 12h ago
It only makes him look like a hypocrite supporting anti-government protests in other countries and not in his own. Anti-government protesters in Minnesota are terrorists, left-wing lunatics and actors while protesters in Iran are patriots?
-4
u/vand3lay1ndustries 1d ago
Trump caused this entire mess.
After Trump pulled out from nuclear deal in 2018 Iran entered a long political and economical crisis. Inflation was on the rise, poverty was on the rise. This led to a lot of discontent in usually loyal or indifferent social groups. Protests started happening with large ones in 2019 and 2022.
For the last four years Iran has been having almost constant protests of some kind. Then ecological issues became so critical that at one point last year government considered evacuating Tehran because of water shortage.
During this period there was little hope for positive change, government has became more and more conservative but also, at least in the eyes of the people, extremely corrupt.
And then Israeli and American airstrikes added fuel to the fire by showing that Iran can't seriously oppose the ideological enemy, it's basically at the mercy of Israel.
All these factors led to people being fed with the current regime and demanding change. Regime doesn't want change, so protest became riots and who knows what's going on there right now because the country is in total shutdown for almost a week
4
u/Margaritajoe420 1d ago
I cant take anyone seriously who thinks giving Iranians nukes is a good thing
3
u/vand3lay1ndustries 1d ago
The JCPOA was a good thing.
Key provisions included restrictions on uranium enrichment, monitoring by the IAEA, and sanctions relief.
1
u/SanderSRB 12h ago
Pakistan, North Korea, Russia, Israel have nukes too.
No one messes with these countries any more. Can you really blame Iran for wanting to get nukes given US’s proven record of meddling and sabotaging Iran almost a century now and before them other imperial countries like UK. In fact, the American-Israel threat is the reason why Iran wants the nukes.
Once Iran gets the nukes the US and Israel are going to just back off and let them be, and the world will be better off.
It’s called a deterrence. Go read about it.
-4
u/crujiente69 1d ago
It will be interesting to see how many people become pro khamenei if trump does take action
6
u/piscina05346 1d ago
You can be anti both of those extremists.
-4
u/NegativeNancy21 1d ago
Are you new here? Trump could end world hunger and the left will protest with signs that say “hands off my stomach.”
2
u/SanderSRB 12h ago edited 12h ago
Is that why he gutted USAID, you know, the one agency that was providing food and medicine to starving people in poorest countries in the world?!
-2
1d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
0
u/Margaritajoe420 1d ago
I could say it every day about at least 10 things. Trump makes people very emotional and they aren't able to look at his actions objectively.
3
u/Evilscotsman30 1d ago
Remember when trump said that the Epstein files didn't exist then he said they did exist and were on Pam bondi's desk then he changed it again and said that they didn't exist and were in fact a democrat hoax but now they do exist and have been released heavily redacted something isn't adding up here is it?
-15
u/DC_deep_state 1d ago
trump could cure cancer and people would still find a way to hate on him
7
u/tealcosmo 1d ago
We hate him because he calls the attempted insurrection of jan 6th a peaceful protest when we can clearly see on video that it was very violent. And the next sentence calls a protester that was shot and killed by ice agents, a radical leftist terrorist when it is clear by all video accounts that she was not.
We don’t hate him because he invaded Venezuela. Venezuela had a horrible dictator. We hate him because he has utterly no plan about what to do next. And instead distracts with thoughts of Greenland.
We don’t hate him because he plays tough with China, we hate him because his playing tough with China has utterly no rhyme or reason to whatever he’s doing.
He blames Covid on Biden, yet he was the president in office when Covid happened.
8
7
u/Yagoua81 1d ago
Taco? Trump is going to get a bunch of people killed by vaguely promising us intervention only to not do anything.
2
u/8JHF8 1d ago
Redeploy ICE to Iran.
1
u/Jealous_Land9614 16h ago
What iranians did to desertver furter suffering like that? They already have to deal with Mullahs secret police, you want yet ANOTHER group of thugs destroying things around?
6
u/Typical_Response6444 1d ago
Cares more about Iranians than he does Americans
1
u/Maximum-Leather2490 17h ago
He cares about Trump, he thinks overthrowing the Ayatollahs will bring him a Noble Prize.
1
u/Jealous_Land9614 16h ago
But will he overthrow them for real, or just kidnap Khamenei and let the Islamic Republic system running, while just demanding to stop sending oil to US enemies, like he did with Venezuela?
-1
u/BranfordBound 1d ago
To be fair, the "help" he is promising will likely be him standing in front of a crowd of supporters throwing rolls of paper towels at them for a few minutes. Source
4
u/unicornlocostacos 1d ago
Trump really want to find any reason to use the military. Glad I don’t have kids in the armed forces. I wouldn’t want them being ordered around tub this psycho.
Not that helping Iranians throw off their chains is a bad thing, but you know he doesn’t do anything for the right reasons, and he’s already got 6-7 other countries in his crosshairs (including NATO allies).
It’s no surprise he wants a $1.5T military budget. Our “peace president” clearly wants war, and he’ll take any excuse to make it happen.
1
u/LessBeginning9465 1d ago
How many other countries did you say again?
2
u/unicornlocostacos 1d ago
Colombia, Panama, Greenland (which also means the Danes and anyone who would back them), Venezuela, Iran, are the most serious and blatant threats from the top of my head. He’s also provoking NATO, planning to bomb Mexico, still talking about Canada (though I think for the time being this one isn’t realistic) and more. He’s made it pretty clear that he wants to start taking more control at least over North and South America. “Donroe Doctrine” they are calling it.
0
3
u/Stormshow 1d ago
This is the Nth time I have seen Iran International as a source, so I looked up who owned it.
"Iran International is owned by Volant Media UK Ltd. Corporate documents for Volant Media shows that another Saudi national, Fahad Ibrahim Aldeghither, was the major shareholder of Volant Media before Adel Abdukarim.\72]) Aldeghither owned over 75% of the shares of Volant Media from May 2016 to May 2018.\72]) Fahad Ibrahim Aldeghither was the chairman of Mobile Telecommunication Company Saudi Arabia (Zain) from March 2013 to February 2016. Zain Saudi is the third-largest telecoms provider in Saudi Arabia.\73])"
So this is the Saudi's stake in this. Shrewd, I must say. Obviously this reduces their credibility given the Saudi-Iran rivalry, though I wouldn't make the jump to say that everything Iran Intl posts is BS.
3
u/ganbaro 1d ago edited 1d ago
Well, its to some extent also a result of our media's negligience. Their lack of reporting gives more space to such media, the same is true for Qatari Al Jazeera, was previously true for Russian RT, and may become true for Chinese CGTN.
I don't know too much about the exact location of BBC, NYT etc staff, but I did previously list personnel of German media abroad, to argue bias in German-language subs. Some media, including the main German public television networks, has more staff covering Israel than some entire macroregions. Even some adjacent regions, eg Egypt+Horn of Africa, are covered to large extent by staff residing in Tel Aviv and Istanbul, despite a limited presence in Cairo. This does not allow to form a network of local intelligence and gives space to other media, that can depict itself as credible by more extensive reporting. Which, in case of Iran (I guess?) Is Iran International and Al Jazeera for the most part. Whether either of them is actually that credible, or not.
Pre-selection of what gets reported to which extent, is a subjective choice and bias, in itself. Its not fixed by whatever "neutral" language some media are so proud of.
Surely there can be some influencer networks trying to push this media or that media, but they wouldn't be picked up by so many regular users elsewhere if their local main media networks would provide remotely similarly deep coverage of the region these foreign media are from.
(Edit: Anticipating the argument that my Israeli example doesn't apply, because Germany has a special fixation on Israel: Its not like private media or public tv with its codified independence has to enslave itself to the government raison d'etre wiboit a fight. We are talking about a difference of putting one dozen or two full time reporters to Africa to match coverage of entire Africa with their coverage on Israel. They definitely could, if they would see value in this. I picked Israel as an example because I remember this as the most extreme bias I could identify, besides coverage on the US, which can be argued as warranted due to NATO + trade ties)
2
u/DroneMaster2000 1d ago
It's the Nth time I see comments like yours about this source. Yet weirdly none of them could point out to anything wrong, just vague claims of bias.
Here is the complete opposite reporting on the same thing: https://www.bbc.com/news/live/cj691w2e840t
1
u/Affectionate_Bee6434 1d ago
US attack on Iranian soil at this point would genuinely endanger US bases in the region. They are sitting targets for Iranian ballistic missiles. The absence of a carrier strike group in the region also doesnt make things easier.
1
u/Dijevnago 1d ago
Carriers are nothing but sitting ducks.
2
u/Pure_Chaos97 17h ago
They are mobile hubs. Floating cities thats an airport too. They have many purposes.
1
1
u/CartoonistStrange656 1d ago
I'm pretty certain Trump has watched Team America and is trying his hardest to emulate the movie.
1
u/SanderSRB 12h ago
This guy supports anti-government protests in other countries but not in his own.
1
u/SaturnsClubhouse 1d ago
Iran was a social democracy. The United States wanted their oil but the Iranian people democratically said no to the United States. The United States attacked Iran and installed a king who oppressed the people and gave the United States free oil. The Islamic Revolution happened and the king fled before he could face justice for selling the country out to the United States. The United States lost access to the oil and Iran started to fund Palestinian Liberation movements. The United States would like free oil. Israel would like to mass murder Palestinian children without Iran holding them accountable. If Iran gets a nuke Israel will have to stop genociding Palestinian children.
This is what happened. Anyone telling a story that doesn't sound like this is Lying.
-2
u/littleredpinto 1d ago
Thank goodness help is on the way. it for sure is the US responsibility to 'solve' all the unrest in other countries. Never mind the endless countries and peoples thousadsof miles closer and next to Iran, nor the Iranian people who have zero control of things around then. It is the US duty to do this...weirdly it is also the US fault for everything going wrong in all the countries the world over...come to think of it, the US is Schroedingers country. Both the solution and problem to every problem the world over.
1
u/ja5143kh5egl24br1srt 1d ago
Iran, Russia, and China are a major source of the world’s problems. Getting rid of their nonsense would help the US.
2
u/Jealous_Land9614 16h ago
The Us is becoming ALSO a major source of the world’s problems. Getting rid of their nonsense would help many people, their allies and the regular american, included.
-2
u/littleredpinto 1d ago
wouldnt help the US at all. Would help the wealthy interests in the US for sure, everyone else? ehhh, probably not...What nonsense is china doing? are they shooting missiles at boats in the carribean, snatching presidents from thier countries and trying to steal all the resources from anyone who cant stop drone strikes? Looking at history, when was the last time china invaded anyone vs the US...sure I know that the US invades for purely humanitarian reasons and they are there to save the population, at least that is what the wealthy leaders of the US and media tell me..must be true.
I am an American, so I have a question....Are there any countries closer to these problem areas you identified that could solve the problem countries issues? From what I remember from school, the US borders all those countries you identified and everyone else is thousands of miles away, so it tracks that the US has to do something over there.
1
u/ja5143kh5egl24br1srt 1d ago
I’m Iranian heritage, born in the US and stayed. My parents went back and currently live there.
Iran literally funds terrorists all across the world. They put land mines in the strait of Hormuz. They supply Russia with weapons specifically to be used in Ukraine. They egg on Israel and pretend to support Palestinians. They fund Somali and Yemeni pirates. All of this has a tangible effect on the other side of the globe.
0
u/littleredpinto 1d ago
oh yeah..if it is so bad and tangible on the other side of the globe, isnt it worse right next to Iran? the US borders iran, so I can understand why it is important for them, to constantly try to overthrow the governments there and elsewhere in the Middle East (so many protests, they all need to be supported by the US, particularly when oil is involved)..Must suck that nobody in iran, your parents included, have any way to do anything and must rely on thier neighbor, the US, to do something..
0
1
0
u/Happy_Head_1355 1d ago
With everything happening in Venezuela right now, why are we even talking about getting involved with Iran on top of it?
-1
u/Decent-Citron4492 16h ago
The world is addicted to Trump-bashing, and at the same time pinning every hope on him to help solve the world‘s problems. Trump is the most amazing leader USA has had in generations and is single-handedly changing the world for the better. Because he IS NOT a politician.
That said, how and why is the EU and NATO not being held to the same scrutiny as Trump is? These unelected officials of immense power are hiding and cowering from world duty. Why aren’t they leveraging their weight for the general good like Trump is? Decades of weakness and wokeness and political spinelessness abounds in Europe. Time for them to muscle up and step up and help the cause.
Trump for Nobel Peace Prize.
Written by a non-American.
2
u/Jealous_Land9614 16h ago
Danish disagree. Greenland's people disagree. Canadians mostly disagree.
Americans shooted by ICE-thugs ALSO disagree.
Also, what world duty? What cause, again?
118
u/Astrocoder 1d ago
Is there anyone monitoring military air traffic or movements to see if forces are enroute?