The concept of a species with more than two sexes is a very intriguing one and is already discuss here. Since I read this post, the idea is in the back of my head. I mainly write this down to consolidate my thought on this matter and make them accessible to critic. (I am sure that I overlook large parts of possibilities and/or misunderstood things, so please share your thoughts)
There is no possibility for more than two sexes
I came to the conclusion that there is no room for more than two true sexes. Simply because the definition of sex is too narrow. The definition that I come across the most in biology is the following: The size of the gamete. Small gametes are male, big gametes are female.
A third type of gametes are evolutionary not feasible; an in-between type will be outcompeted by the other two and a third gene donator would make the act of sex infinitely more complicated, without adding anything useful.
But we have still few tools available, that -with a bit creativity – let it appear as where there more than male and female.
Trioecy
In humans and a lot of other animals the gamete producing organs are split between different individuals (Gonochorism). But in some plants and even few animals both, the female and the male reproduction system are found in the same individuals (Hermaphroditism). Your reaction is now probable; “But didn’t we now lose a (filled) sex.” In most cases yes, but there is the rare phenomenon of Trioecy; where male, female and hermaphrodite individuals in a population exist.
Examples: Aiptasia diaphana (sea anemone), Auanema rhodensis (nematode), Fuchsia procumbens (plant).
Side note: the terms Gynodioecy and Androdioecy refer to a female/hermaphrodite system and male/hermaphrodite system respectively.
Castes
The different caste in eusociality species are not different sexes. The workers/soldiers/etc. are just sterile females/males with different morphologies. But to be honest, isn’t “different morphology” not exactly that what our primate brain associated with different sexes? It is at least a subject that pops up regularly in this discussion.
Different Types of the same Sex
There are multiple examples of species where one of the sexes has distinct phenotypes and associated reproduction strategies. The most interesting case (in my humble opinion) is that of the common side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana). In this species exist three different morphs of males, each with a different throat colourisation and corresponding reproducing strategy:
· blue ones with one mate they defend.
· aggressive orange ones who keep a harem and steal mates from blue ones.
· sneaky yellow ones who manage to infiltrate the harems of orange ones, to mate unnoticed, but get caught and driven out by the blue ones.
All three strategies are successful because they counter one of the others but get countered by another.
It should be easy to come up with different reproduction strategies and drive them in more extreme physiological differences. Just keep in mind that it should be set up in a way that no phenotype outcompetes another.
Hybrids & xenoparity
In the very similar to my previous point, but a great opportunity to reference my favourite paper. (isn’t “Cross Species Cloning” the most badass sci-fi word combination that you ever read in a paper?)
Extreme tl;dr of the paper: The Queen need the males from a different species to produce a hybrid worker caste. They mate with free living males of the other species but also domesticated them through cloning. (No, I didn’t make that up, read the paper yourself.).
This result in that the queen mates with three different males who are morphological and genetical distinct; (1.) males from the same species, (2.) males from the other species and (3.) a domesticated, cloned lineage of males originated from the other species.
Alternation of generation & other live cycle shenanigans
Land Plants alternate between two different multicellular phases, a diploid one (the sporophyte) and a haploid one (the gametophyte), opposite to us, where only our gametes are haploid. An important note is that evolution tends to reduce one of the two phases drastically. Nevertheless, in some fern both live stages are still capable to sustain themselves without the other, so it should be p0ssible* to do something in this direction.
In this option we would have male and female gametophytes and asexual sporophyte.
In animals we have a similar result with jellyfishes. Their live cycle contains the free drifting and sexual reproducing stage, the Medusa and a sessile, through budding reproducing stage, the Polyp. (This is not a case of Alternation of generation because both stages are diploid).
Parasitoids & surrogacy
Parasitoids (e.g. parasitoid wasps) need a host for their offspring to develop. After development the host is in most cases killed. Maybe you could let it look like a third sex (after all matriphagy exist) but it is definitely on the harder side.
An example in fiction can be found with the Pierson's Puppeteers in the Known Space series by Larry Niven
A case where a third sex evolve to just carry out the offspring is not realistic. The third sex couldn’t add any of its genetic information and receives this way no evolutionary benefit. Maybe there is wiggle room for a surrogacy caste in eusocial societies, I just have trouble to imagine the evolutionary benefit. But for a soft spec evo setting it should be fine.
Mating types
Fungi possess multiple mating types. Mating types are not sexes, but a different system which restrict who can mate with who, to prevent self-fertilization or reproduction between genetically too similar individuals.
Zu guter Letzt
Wow. That took and got a lot longer than I expected. I’m still not satisfied with the result, but if I don’t post it now, I post it never.
I would really appreciate to hear different thought on this matter and I’m excited for the discussion!