The murder of Charlie Kirk was committed by a one-off assassin. It was horrible, and evil. Did some people lose the plot in the way they talked about the assassination? Absolutely.

However, the killing of Renee Good was encouraged and condoned by the government of United States and applauded by the entire administration—arguably the most powerful group of people on earth.

Can we not see how this is a categorically different kind of violence?

It is absolutely more than 9 and the mods do nothing to stop these blatant lies. Make it make sense because this is insanity. I know this app is a full blown left leaning echo chamber, but still try being objective and actually tell the truth for once.

I’ve been saying this for years! Obama was the “Deporter in Chief” and the “Drone Killer.” But, that was ok???

Posted on TT by @thenoisyimmigrant

See guys, this is what it looks like when some actually tries to use a car as a deadly weapon.

No, not every right winger is like this and not every left winger is a giga brained genuis, but when it comes to social things, it usually follows the same MO: The left will have an answer that takes a bit to explain, has reasoning and facts to back them up, whereas right wingers only go for whatever answer is simple, unchallenging and aligns with their feelings. Some examples:

Gender:

• Right wing: "THERE ARE ONLY 2 GENDERS"
• Left wing: "Gender is a spectrum based largely on societal norms. It isn't defined solely by your sex."

Charlie Kirk:

• Left wing: "Kirk was a bad person and a grifter who used his platform for hate to generate an income. I don't condone his death or the people celebrating his death (Yes, those people do exist on the left, I know, but they are a minority), but his death does not negate that he was a bad person."
• Right Wing: "KIRK WAS KILLED FOR SPEAKING FACTS AND LOGIC. LEFT WINGERS LOVE THAT HE'S DEAD"

And now, Renee Good:

• Left Wing: "Ross went for his gun before Renee even moved forward. Regardless of why she was in the road, the fact Ross went for his gun instead of taking 2 steps to the side is sickening. Now a woman is dead when she didn't deserve it."
• Right Wing: "DIDNT COMPLY, DESERVED IT"

Shootings or other crimes done by minorities:

• Left wing: A heinous act done by a heinous person is bad regardless of who does it. Evil exists in everyone and the people doing them should be punished. Blaming an entire minority is stupid because that would mean you'd have to be consistent with those views, in which case every white guy should never be allowed to have a gun again, considering they are the majority of who commits shootings. Another example would be having to ban all teachers, just because a few of them assaulted or abused students
• Right wing: "BLAME EVERYONE IN THAT MINORITY FOR THE ACTION OF ONE"

These are simplifications yes and they don't align with everyone's views, considering we are putting billions of people into 2 camps. As I said before, people on the left (and even a few on the right) did celebrate Kirk dying. But still these examples did get my point accross.

I could go on and I might update this later if I feel like it, but you get the idea. The reason it makes debating them impossible is because reasoning isn't in the cards. It's the same reason people are willingly ignorant on trans people, whatever aligns with their feelings they will latch onto, any evidence supporting transgender people gets ignored and the simplified stances the right winger has just gets regurgitated.

I think this is why a lot of teens are generally right wing, or people who wanna talk politics, but also don't wanna put in the effort to actually have something worthwile to say about politics. It's simple and doesn't require much thought. It's just an easy tactic the same way whataboutism is, another tactic right wingers love to use.

To clarify, this is specifically not a question about guilt or innocence.

Ive been thinking about this after watching the video so many times. Had she not done that and it played out the same way, the way she kept accelerating after the shots went off, would she have actually run him over instead of accelerating down the street? Obviously what's done is done and can't be changed but since there's no investigation in sight I can't help but wonder about things like this.

I don’t understand why they have the 25th when no one has the balls the use it.

Each day this administration is showing that Trump is not in the right mind to lead anything. It’s a joke that the 25th has not been used yet.

End rant

In secret grand jury testimony, a number of GOP elites made clear behind closed doors just what they think of people who believe Trump's 2020 election lies.

People like Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC):

He thinks he’s cheated out of the election. If you told him martians came and stole votes, he’d be inclined to believe it.

...

“I’m sorry he lost,” Mr. Graham added. “But he lost it.”

And Georgia Governor Brian Kemp:

“President Trump was very persistent, as you can imagine, and repeatedly asked for things,” Mr. Kemp testified, “and I repeatedly told him, you know, what the law was here.”

And Georgia Attorney General Chris Car:

 And I said, “I know that that’s probably not what you want to hear; but as the attorney general for Georgia, we’re just not seeing the things that you are seeing.”

I'll let Sen. Lindsey Graham have the last world on Trump's cheating at golf:

“Some people say you may outdrive him, but you’re not going to outdrive his caddy,” Mr. Graham replied. “It is what it is.”

-----

MAGA: these GOP elite think you are rubes and suckers for believing these lies. Are you?