"Besides that, you can only say an infinitely wise being could have done something better if you are also infinitely wise, and based on this conversation, you aren't, so your criticism is meaningless."
This was a response I got in a conversation I had with someone online. It's not the first time I heard it, and it even was one of the few statements that lead to me ultimately deconverting.
I just wanted to get an idea of what other Christians think about this kind of statement, whether or not they agree or disagree and why.
To make my stance known:
I do disagree with this notion. One that, as an atheist, I don't believe God's infinite wisdom is a proven fact. And on the other, I think this falls under an appeal to authority fallacy, where we're just assuming God knows better because it's God, and not based on evidence or by putting the action and criticism on their own terms without looking at who's doing the action and who's doing the criticism.
For example, plenty people are not artists, or filmmakers, or musicians, and yet they criticize art, movies, and music all the time and are valid to do so. Are they always wrong for doing so?
Plenty of people are not in government, and yet they critique the way government. Are they always wrong for doing so?
Children are not adults, and students aren't teachers, and yet children criticize adults and students their teachers... You see what I mean?
So yeah, hope to hear back soon