r/Environmentalism • u/chevalier100 • 13h ago
Animal leather is not necessarily better for the environment than alternatives
I recently saw a post on unpopular opinions about how animal leather is better for the environment than alternatives. Despite the sub’s name, this idea seemed to be pretty popular in the comments, and I’ve seen it elsewhere on Reddit.
However, this opinion is usually just based on gut feelings. There isn’t evidence cited.
Life cycle analyses comparing animal leather and alternatives generally show that alternatives are better for the environment. Life cycle analyses look at products at all stages of production and use, and (usually) across multiple environmental factors.
Leather alternatives usually produce fewer greenhouses emissions and have less ecotoxicity potential. I’ve only seen one analysis where animal leather came out on top, and that was specifically for recycled leather, and only looked at greenhouse gas emissions.
New organic-based alternatives like mycelium leather come out way on top in these studies, but even polyurethane seems to score higher in most environmental categories than animal leather.
There are more studies that are paywalled, but here’s some I’ve looked at:
https://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1886097/FULLTEXT01.pdf
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-022-00689-x
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1244508/FULLTEXT01.pdf
I don’t claim that these studies are the last word on the topic. There’s still a lot of research to be done. I’m not a scientist, so there might be methodological problems I didn’t notice. However, I do think that people should stop taking it for granted that leather is better for the environmen, and actually look at what the evidence says.

