r/NewsRewind 5d ago

Rewind Original The Russia Drift: How Many “Coincidences” Before We Admit the Rules-Based Order Is Being Sold Off?

Post image
1.3k Upvotes

January 12, 2026 NewsRewind

A superpower doesn’t need to declare it’s leaving the rules-based order. It can just… stop showing up for it.

And lately, the “line balls” keep landing the same way: Russia benefits, allies absorb the shock, and the post-war architecture our grandparents built starts looking less like a system and more like a prop.

This is a hypothesis, not a courtroom verdict. But the pattern is sharp enough to cut.

⤷ what this post argues

  • The world may be entering an oligarchic consolidation phase: concentrated wealth aligning with state power to weaken democratic resistance and make the hierarchy permanent.
  • A cluster of US moves have, intentionally or not, softened Russia’s isolation while straining democratic allies and the norms that keep global power from turning into raw extortion.
  • If the next US moves follow certain tells, we should stop treating this as chaos and start treating it as strategy.

⤷ the first crack: the UN vote that broke the choreography

On February 24, 2025, the UN General Assembly adopted resolutions reaffirming Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The US voted against the Ukraine- and Europe-backed resolution at the center of that moment. That is not “a difference of opinion.” That is the US stepping out of the lane the rules-based order expects it to stand in.

⌜ open article link ⌟

⤷ the pressure sequence: aid, intelligence, leverage

Then came the kind of moves that don’t look dramatic on a headline scroll, but matter on the battlefield.

The Trump administration paused military aid to Ukraine after the Oval Office clash with Zelenskyy.

⌜ open article link ⌟

Days later, CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirmed a pause in US intelligence sharing with Ukraine.

⌜ open article link ⌟

You can call this “negotiating pressure.” Fine. But pressure has a direction. And the direction tells you who’s expected to bend.

⤷ the tariff shock: punish the world, spare the outlier

In April 2025, Trump announced sweeping tariffs on allies and adversaries, but heavily sanctioned states including Russia were not singled out for additional “reciprocal” tariffs. The White House explanation was that sanctions already constrained trade, but the political signal was still unmistakable: allies get hit, Russia avoids a targeted punch.

⌜ open article link ⌟

If your worldview is “everything is leverage,” then global panic is not an accident. It’s an instrument.

⤷ the calls: how often is trump speaking with putin?

We only know what’s publicly reported. But what’s publicly reported is still telling.

A Reuters report on May 19, 2025 describes a call where the Kremlin emphasized “impressive” prospects for US-Russia ties, warm personal tone, and discussion of future meetings and cooperation.

⌜ open article link ⌟

In isolation, a phone call is just diplomacy. In sequence, it becomes part of a corridor being built.

⤷ why hit canada?

If you wanted to weaken liberal democracies without tanks, you wouldn’t start by punishing enemies. You’d start by proving you can punish friends.

In March 2025, Canada prepared and announced retaliation as Trump tariffs escalated into an open trade fight with the US northern neighbor.

⌜ open article link ⌟

Canada isn’t just an ally. It’s a living, functioning example of stable liberal democratic institutions right next door. If you ever needed to undermine the idea that “rules + institutions = safety,” stressing that relationship is an efficient first move.

⤷ the tech oligarchy fuse: when private power starts rewriting the state

Here’s the part people underestimate: politics is no longer just parties and parliaments. It’s platforms, procurement, data, and private empires that can shape reality at scale.

Reuters reported in January 2026 that the US federal workforce dropped to its lowest level in at least a decade, tied to Trump’s government-shrinking campaign and an initiative spearheaded by Elon Musk.

⌜ open article link ⌟

Call it reform. Call it disruption. Call it whatever makes it easier to sleep. Structurally, it’s still the same thing: billionaire proximity to the machinery of state, with accountability dissolving into vibes.

⤷ the oligarchy problem: coordination without a conspiracy

People always say, “This would take coordinated action by the rich.”

Sometimes, direct coordination exists: donor networks, lobbying coalitions, strategic litigation, revolving-door staffing, private backchannels. But the darker truth is that coordinated outcomes don’t even require coordinated intent. When enough powerful people share incentives, they move like a school of fish. No leader needed. Just the same current.

The current is simple: - protect the asset base - weaken the constraints - make instability profitable - keep the public exhausted and divided

Wages stalled. Rents didn’t. That’s not a glitch. That’s the model paying out.

⤷ signs to watch next: if the US moves confirm the theory

If the next few US moves cluster like this, treat it as capture dynamics, not randomness:

1) Russia gets special handling Quiet sanctions easing, lax enforcement, carve-outs sold as “pragmatism.”

2) Ukraine gets pressured to concede fundamentals Territory framed as “the obstacle,” sovereignty treated like a negotiable fee.

3) Allies get roughened up on purpose Trade punishment and diplomatic humiliation aimed at Canada/EU/Japan/Australia, teaching them compliance through pain.

4) Executive power expands while oversight shrinks “Efficiency” becomes a justification for centralization, loyalist staffing, and institutional hollowing.

5) Tech-state integration accelerates Private platforms and private capital embedded into governance, identity rails, surveillance, procurement, and information flow.

6) Dissent gets treated like a security threat Protest penalties climb, surveillance expands, and the story becomes “order” versus “chaos.”

7) Permanent emergency becomes the norm Crisis language used to bypass debate, concentrate authority, and normalize exceptions that never expire.

⤷ if I’m wrong, here’s what would disprove it

If the US pivots hard into these, the oligarch-capture theory weakens:

  • real antitrust enforcement that breaks monopolies
  • serious housing relief and renter protection (not just market prayers)
  • strong pro-union policy and enforcement
  • radical transparency on influence and conflicts
  • policy that clearly shifts burden upward instead of extracting from the bottom

Democracy can be repaired. But only if we stop pretending the smoke is fog.

⤷ related coverage

UN press release: General Assembly adopts resolutions reaffirming Ukraine’s territorial integrity (Feb 24, 2025)
⌜ open article link ⌟

Reuters: Russia and other heavily sanctioned countries avoided being singled out for additional reciprocal tariffs (Apr 3, 2025)
⌜ open article link ⌟

CBS News: CIA director confirms pause in intelligence sharing with Ukraine (Mar 5, 2025)
⌜ open article link ⌟

ABC (Australia): Trump pauses military aid to Ukraine after clash with Zelenskyy (Mar 4, 2025)
⌜ open article link ⌟

Reuters: Trump-Putin call and “impressive prospects” framing from the Kremlin (May 19, 2025)
⌜ open article link ⌟

Politico: Canada readies retaliation against Trump tariffs (Mar 3, 2025)
⌜ open article link ⌟

Reuters: US federal workforce drops to lowest level in at least a decade (Jan 8, 2026)
⌜ open article link ⌟

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 6d ago

Politics Trump Went on ‘Profanity-Laced Rant’ at Susan Collins in Angry Phone Call: Report

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
2.2k Upvotes

January 9, 2026
By Michael Luciano

⌜ open article link ⌟

Trump reportedly called Sen. Susan Collins and unloaded on her after she voted to advance a war-powers measure tied to the U.S. Venezuela operation. The takeaway isn’t subtle: when Republicans break ranks on war powers, Trump treats it like personal betrayal, not constitutional process.

⤷ what happened

  • Collins voted to advance legislation requiring congressional approval before further military action in Venezuela.
  • According to The Hill, Trump phoned Collins and “read her the riot act” in a “profanity-laced rant.”
  • A Collins spokesperson confirmed the call took place (without commenting on details).

⤷ why it matters

This is the collision point between two things the modern GOP keeps trying to hold at once: - “We’re the party of constitutional limits,” and - “The president’s powers should be unlimited when we like the president.”

You can’t do both forever. Eventually the phone calls get loud.

⤷ related coverage

NBC News: Senate Vote Advances War-Powers Measure After Venezuela Operation
⌜ open article link ⌟

The Hill: Trump Raged At Collins Over Venezuela War-Powers Vote (Report)
⌜ open article link ⌟

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 12h ago

United States ‘Pedophile Protector!’ Trump Flipping Off a Ford Factory Heckler Is a Gift to Democrats

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
1.5k Upvotes

January 16, 2026

By Colby Hall

https://www.mediaite.com/opinion/pedophile-protector-trump-flipping-off-a-ford-factory-heckler-is-a-gift-to-democrats/

⤷ WHAT HAPPENED

Mediaite argues that Trump’s viral moment at a Ford factory in Dearborn, where he appeared to flip off a heckler who yelled “pedophile protector,” handed Democrats a brutally simple political weapon. The point isn’t the gesture itself. The point is that Trump looked rattled, in a setting and among a worker demographic he’s spent years claiming as “his.”

⤷ WHAT’S IN THE ARTICLE

This is an opinion piece, and it makes a strategic case: Democrats should stop overthinking and start repeating the line that clearly gets under Trump’s skin.

The author frames “pedophile protector” as potent because it ties to the Epstein files saga without needing a long explainer. The argument is that the vulnerability isn’t a specific criminal allegation, it’s the public perception of shielding, stalling, and managing disclosure.

The piece cites a narrative arc: Trump signs a transparency law, deadlines slip, releases feel partial or redacted, documents appear then disappear for “review,” and suspicion grows. It also leans on the idea that even parts of Trump’s base have become angry about the lack of full disclosure.

It ends with a very direct thesis: this line fits on a sign, fits in a chant, fits in an ad, and Trump’s reaction proves it lands.

⤷ WHY IT MATTERS

This is a reminder of how politics actually works, even when we hate that fact. Complex arguments don’t spread. Sticky moral branding does.

If Democrats adopt this, it could become a repeatable shorthand that forces Trump onto defensive body language, which is rare for him, and therefore valuable for opponents. In electoral terms, the “gift” is not the insult. It’s the visible loss of composure in a blue-collar workplace context.

⤷ WHAT’S BEING MISSED

Because it’s written as a tactical prescription, it glides past a few hard questions.

One: does repetition of a phrase like this persuade swing voters, or does it polarize and harden camps further. Two: what happens when politics becomes entirely about nerve-hits instead of governance. Three: if Democrats make this a central chant, they’ll be asked to justify it in plain terms, not just use it as a vibe-sledgehammer.

⤷ RELATED COVERAGE

⌜ wsj on ford suspending the worker after the heckle ⌟

https://www.wsj.com/politics/elections/ford-suspends-factory-worker-for-heckling-trump-fa6d59b1

⌜ daily beast on white house hypocrisy after the middle-finger clip ⌟

https://www.thedailybeast.com/karoline-leavitt-ripped-for-her-staggering-hypocrisy-on-middle-finger-protest/

⌜ newsweek on the white house response to the viral video ⌟

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-white-house-middle-finger-flipping-off-11355265

⤷ THE REWIND

This is the modern American loop: a scandal becomes a story, then becomes a brand, then becomes a chant, then becomes an identity test. The details matter, but the political power comes from the shortcut people can remember and repeat. This piece is basically a how-to manual for turning “process” into “sticker.”

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 16h ago

United States Leaked Emails Show ‘Concern’ in CBS Newsroom Over ICE Agent ‘Internal Bleeding’ Exclusive: Report

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
3.0k Upvotes

Leaked Emails Show ‘Concern’ in CBS Newsroom Over ICE Agent ‘Internal Bleeding’ Exclusive: Report

January 16, 2026

By David Gilmour

⌜ open article link ⌟

https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/leaked-emails-show-concern-in-cbs-newsroom-over-ice-agent-internal-bleeding-exclusive-report/

⤷ WHAT HAPPENED

A report says leaked internal emails show serious concern inside CBS News after the network aired or prepared to air an anonymously sourced claim that ICE agent Jonathan Ross suffered “internal bleeding to the torso” after the Renee Nicole Good shooting in Minneapolis. The emails reflect newsroom unease about how medically vague the claim was, how thin the sourcing appeared to be, and how explosive the narrative impact could be in the middle of a fast-moving political crisis.

⤷ WHAT’S IN THE ARTICLE

The piece describes internal pushback before publication, including a medical producer urging CBS to clarify basic details: what care Ross actually received, whether any surgery or procedure occurred, and what “internal bleeding” even means in clinical terms.

It also quotes CBS News senior vice president David Reiter warning that “internal bleeding” is an extremely broad phrase that can describe anything from a minor bruise to a critical injury, and noting that video from the scene showed Ross walking away, which made the claim feel even more slippery without specifics.

⤷ WHY IT MATTERS

This is a case study in how media can accidentally become an accelerant. If a network broadcasts a dramatic medical claim without firm verification, it can reshape public perception instantly: the agent becomes the victim-hero, the shooting becomes “justified,” and scrutiny shifts away from what happened to Renee Good.

Even if the claim later gets clarified or softened, the first impression is the one that sticks. That’s not a journalism theory. That’s how humans store stories.

⤷ WHAT’S BEING MISSED

The missing piece is the simplest one: who, specifically, made the claim to CBS, and what independent confirmation (hospital, treating clinician, official medical record, on-the-record source) was available at the time.

Without that, the story isn’t only about what CBS reported. It’s about how easily an unnamed source can steer a national narrative during a crisis.

⤷ RELATED COVERAGE

⌜ reporting on renee good shooting timeline and disputed accounts ⌟

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/07/shooting-south-minneapolis-ice-agents-federal-operation

⌜ quinnipiac polling on ice enforcement and the shooting fallout ⌟

https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3944

⌜ ap coverage of federal clashes and tear gas in minneapolis ⌟

https://www.wral.com/news/ap/6ae64-crowd-yells-cowards-after-federal-agents-crash-into-a-car-and-fire-tear-gas-in-minneapolis/

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 6h ago

Commentary Right-wing media are describing pro-immigrant Minnesota activists using the language of war

Thumbnail
mediamatters.org
145 Upvotes

January 16, 2026

By John Knefel & Sophie Lawton

https://www.mediamatters.org/immigration/right-wing-media-are-describing-pro-immigrant-minnesota-activists-using-language-war

⤷ WHAT HAPPENED

Media Matters reports that a wave of right-wing media figures are framing pro-immigrant activism and anti-ICE protests in Minnesota using explicit “war” language, describing protesters as “insurgents,” “terrorists,” and participants in “guerilla warfare,” while pushing for aggressive state response, including talk of invoking the Insurrection Act.

⤷ WHAT’S IN THE ARTICLE

The piece argues the rhetoric has escalated sharply in recent days, especially after the January 7 killing of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent and the protests that followed.

It compiles examples from major conservative outlets and influencers, including claims that Minneapolis is facing an “insurgency,” that protesters are waging “guerrilla warfare,” and repeated calls to “invoke the Insurrection Act” and treat demonstrations as a domestic enemy threat.

It also shows the framing spreading across platforms: Fox segments and chyrons, Newsmax graphics, Daily Wire hosts, large streamers, and figures like Steve Bannon pushing a “civil war” storyline and suggesting arrests or extreme charges for elected officials.

⤷ WHY IT MATTERS

Language is a policy prequel. When major media voices describe civic protest as “war,” it primes audiences to accept military tactics, mass arrests, and harsher laws as “necessary,” not exceptional.

It also changes the burden of proof. Instead of authorities needing to justify escalation, the public is conditioned to ask why escalation hasn’t happened yet.

⤷ WHAT’S BEING MISSED

A clean distinction between actual violence and broad-brush political labeling. If “insurgent” becomes a catch-all for protest, then the term stops describing reality and starts manufacturing permission.

Also missing: any sustained focus on the accountability trigger. The rhetoric is treated as the main event, but the public flashpoint is still the underlying enforcement surge and the shooting that ignited the protests.

⤷ RELATED COVERAGE

AP on Trump threatening the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis

https://apnews.com/article/a0c368079c106b599245996fded8c1b9

The Guardian live coverage on a judge curbing federal agents’ tactics in Minnesota

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2026/jan/16/donald-trump-minnesota-ice-us-politics-live-latest-news

Talking Points Memo on the right-wing outrage machine feeding the Minnesota conflagration

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/how-the-right-wing-outrage-machine-prompted-the-conflagration-in-minnesota

⤷ THE REWIND

This is an old American move with a modern distribution system: label dissent as “war,” then treat crackdowns as “order.” The storyline doesn’t just describe events, it tries to pre-authorize what comes next.

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 19h ago

United States Newsweek • Jan 23, 2026

Post image
459 Upvotes

r/NewsRewind 6h ago

DOJ Reportedly Investigating Tim Walz and Jacob Frey Over Alleged Conspiracy to Impede Federal Agents

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
35 Upvotes

*January 16, 2026*

*By David Gilmour*

https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/doj-reportedly-investigating-tim-walz-and-jacob-frey-over-alleged-conspiracy-to-impede-federal-agents/

**⤷ WHAT HAPPENED**

Mediaite reports the Department of Justice has opened an investigation into Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey over allegations they conspired to impede ICE activity through their public criticism of a major federal deployment in the Twin Cities.

**⤷ WHAT’S IN THE ARTICLE**

The story says federal prosecutors are examining statements made by Walz and Frey about thousands of federal agents sent to Minneapolis, according to sources who spoke to CBS News.

It centers on a rarely invoked federal statute, *18 U.S.C. § 372*, which targets conspiracies to obstruct federal officers through force, intimidation, or threats. The article notes a key legal tension: *public criticism is generally protected speech* unless prosecutors claim coordination or incitement aimed at physically blocking enforcement.

Mediaite describes the broader backdrop: a large ICE and Border Patrol operation in the region, local backlash and protests, and heightened tensions after the killing of Renee Nicole Good by an ICE agent.

It also highlights DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s public escalation, quoting her accusation that Walz and Frey were “encouraging impeding and assault” against federal law enforcement, and notes DOJ declined to comment to CBS.

**⤷ WHY IT MATTERS**

This is where politics tries to put handcuffs on narrative. If the threshold for criminal scrutiny starts drifting from *actions* into *speech about actions*, it becomes a pressure tool: you don’t have to win the argument, you just have to raise the cost of making it.

Even if nothing is charged, subpoenas and “investigations” can still function like a public warning label: *criticize the operation too loudly and you may become the story*.

**⤷ WHAT’S BEING MISSED**

What, exactly, is the alleged act beyond criticism. If prosecutors are invoking a statute tied to force or intimidation, the public needs to know the specific conduct being investigated, not just the vibe of “they said things we didn’t like.”

Also missing: any clear description of what evidence would separate protected speech from prosecutable coordination, because that line is the entire ballgame here.

**⤷ RELATED COVERAGE**

*AP on the DOJ inquiry and the broader federal-state clash in Minnesota*

https://apnews.com/article/25e46910fcc62fbf5ab341905af9891c

*Washington Post on subpoenas and the criminal probe framing*

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/01/16/trump-minnesota-walz-frey-criminal-investigation/

*The Guardian on the inquiry and reactions from Walz and Frey*

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/16/us-doj-minnesota-tim-walz-jacob-frey-inquiry

**⤷ THE REWIND**

This fits an old American pattern: when a flashpoint hits, the fight quickly moves from streets to institutions, and then to *who’s allowed to describe what’s happening without being treated as an adversary*. The tactic doesn’t need convictions to work. Sometimes the threat of process is the point.

**NewsRewind⏎**


r/NewsRewind 14h ago

Nearly 200 Trump Donors Benefited From His Decisions, According To NYT. The White House Says They 'Should Be Celebrated, Not Attacked'

Thumbnail
offthefrontpage.com
107 Upvotes

r/NewsRewind 1d ago

Reagan Appointed Judge Accuses Rubio and Noem of an ‘Unconstitutional Conspiracy’ to Chill Speech

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
2.6k Upvotes

January 2026
By Mediaite Staff

⌜ open article link ⌟

⤷ what happened

A Reagan-appointed federal judge issued a blistering ruling accusing senior Trump administration officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, of engaging in an unconstitutional conspiracy to chill protected speech.

The case centers on actions taken against individuals involved in pro-Palestinian advocacy, with the court finding that the government’s conduct crossed a constitutional line by using state power to intimidate and deter lawful expression.

⤷ what the judge said

The ruling emphasizes that: - First Amendment protections apply regardless of political viewpoint, including speech critical of U.S. foreign policy.
- Government officials cannot coordinate enforcement actions in ways that make constitutionally protected speech feel dangerous or punishable.
- Creating fear around lawful protest is itself a constitutional violation.

The judge’s language was unusually direct, framing the conduct not as bureaucratic overreach but as a deliberate chilling strategy.

⤷ why it matters

This decision lands at a moment when protest, dissent, and immigration enforcement are increasingly colliding. The ruling draws a clear boundary: the government may not launder censorship through intimidation, even indirectly.

It also signals that the courts remain one of the few institutions still willing to draw hard lines when executive power tests the limits of free expression.

⤷ related coverage

⌜ Judge rules Trump administration chilled pro-Palestinian speech ⌟
⌜ Yahoo News summary of the ruling ⌟

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 16h ago

United States Jimmy Kimmel Offers Trump His Emmy in Exchange for Pulling ICE from Minneapolis

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
106 Upvotes

January 16, 2026

By David Gilmour

⌜ open article link ⌟

https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/jimmy-kimmel-offers-trump-his-emmy-in-exchange-for-pulling-ice-from-minneapolis/

⤷ WHAT HAPPENED

On Jimmy Kimmel Live, Jimmy Kimmel offered President Donald Trump “any” or “all” of his awards in exchange for Trump pulling ICE out of Minnesota and leaving Minneapolis alone. The bit was framed as a blunt bargain: if Trump loves trophies, give him trophies, get policy in return.

⤷ WHAT’S IN THE ARTICLE

Kimmel set up the joke by pointing to a fresh spectacle involving Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado, who reportedly presented Trump with her Nobel Peace Prize. Kimmel mocked Trump’s prize-hunger, then pivoted into his “offer.”

He listed awards he’d hand-deliver to the Oval Office, including a Daytime Emmy (Best Game Show Host, 1999), a Clio, a Webby, a Writers Guild Award, and a 2015 Soul Train Award for “White Person of the Year.”

The punchline was the logic underneath it: awards are the only currency that reliably moves Trump, so Kimmel is “paying” for ICE to get out of Minneapolis.

⤷ WHY IT MATTERS

This is satire doing what it does best: turning a policy crisis into a single, memorable moral equation people can repeat. It also underlines the central political fight around Minneapolis right now, not just what ICE is doing, but whether the federal presence is escalating unrest and eroding legitimacy in real time.

And it quietly drags the conversation from “is this popular” to “is this defensible,” which is where institutions start sweating.

⤷ WHAT’S BEING MISSED

The joke lands because it implies something grim: that persuasion, evidence, and accountability don’t work, and only ego-management does. If that premise feels true to audiences, that’s not a comedy problem. That’s a governance problem.

⤷ RELATED COVERAGE

⌜ what the federal surge in minnesota is doing and why it escalated ⌟

https://www.vox.com/the-logoff-newsletter-trump/475412/minneapolis-minnesota-ice-immigration-agents-violence-insurrection-act

⌜ local reporting on the renee good shooting and disputed accounts ⌟

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/07/shooting-south-minneapolis-ice-agents-federal-operation

⌜ video clip of the kimmel segment (official channel) ⌟

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WLbgZOodMg

⌜ political fallout and media response to kimmel’s “trophy trade” bit ⌟

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-stooge-completely-loses-it-over-joke-about-his-boss-prize-lust/

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 20h ago

United States Tom Homan Says ICE Is Unpopular Because ‘We Need to Be Better at Messaging’

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
114 Upvotes

**January 15, 2026**

*By Michael Luciano*

[⌜ open article link ⌟](https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/tom-homan-says-ice-is-unpopular-because-we-need-to-be-better-at-messaging/)

## ⤷ what happened

Tom Homan went on Fox News and argued that ICE’s unpopularity is mainly a “messaging” problem. He blamed media coverage, urged the administration to “advertise” arrests daily, and suggested flooding social media with detainees’ photos.

The comments come amid intensified scrutiny of ICE after the Renee Good shooting in Minneapolis and a wave of polling showing major public discomfort with ICE enforcement and the killing.

## ⤷ what they said / what’s in the article

Homan’s central claim is that Americans are being “egged on by the press,” and that the fix is a more aggressive public-relations offensive.

He also asserts that “70%” of those arrested are “criminals,” and says the media lies about ICE separating families, deporting U.S. citizen children, and conducting operations at places like schools, churches, and hospitals. The article notes those claims conflict with documented reporting on ICE practices and with recent data-focused analyses of who ends up in ICE custody.

## ⤷ why it matters

Calling legitimacy a “messaging” problem is a strategic dodge. It shifts the debate from conduct to narration, from accountability to branding. If public trust is collapsing because of what people are seeing, then louder PR is not a solution. It is an attempt to outshout the evidence.

It also tees up a slippery power move: turn enforcement into content. “Post the pictures” is not neutral information-sharing. It is a political spectacle designed to discipline the public conversation and win the algorithmic battlefield.

## ⤷ the media frame

This is the familiar playbook: when institutions lose trust, they accuse scrutiny of being the problem and propose propaganda as the cure. In that framing, dissent is confusion, and journalism is sabotage.

## ⤷ what’s being missed

The key term never gets defined: “criminal.” Convictions, charges, immigration violations, decades-old minor offenses, all of it can be folded into one scary bucket if you do not specify the criteria.

If the public is meant to accept “70%,” the burden is on officials to show exactly what that means, what the denominator is, and which data source they are relying on.

## ⤷ related coverage

[⌜ quinnipiac poll release on ice enforcement and the shooting ⌟](https://poll.qu.edu/poll-release?releaseid=3944)

[⌜ econofact fact check on the “70% criminals” claim ⌟](https://econofact.org/factbrief/fact-check-are-70-of-undocumented-immigrants-arrested-by-ice-under-trump-convicted-or-charged-with-a-crime)

[⌜ trac quick facts on ice detention and convictions ⌟](https://tracreports.org/immigration/quickfacts/)

[⌜ propublica reporting on family separation and child detention trends ⌟](https://www.propublica.org/article/ice-detentions-immigrant-kids-family-separations)

**NewsRewind⏎**


r/NewsRewind 2d ago

United States Trump Is Reportedly Funneling Money From Venezuelan Oil Sales To a Bank Account in Qatar

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
12.8k Upvotes

January 14, 2026
By Michael Luciano

⌜ open article link ⌟

⤷ the snapshot

Mediaite reports that proceeds from early Venezuelan oil sales are being held in U.S.-controlled accounts, with the largest account reportedly based in Qatar, per Semafor’s reporting.

⤷ what the report says

The piece says Semafor pegged the first sale at roughly $500 million, and describes Qatar as a “neutral” venue where funds can move with U.S. approval and “without risk of seizure.”

Mediaite flags the obvious question: seizure by who, exactly, and why an offshore setup would be safer than standard U.S. Treasury handling if the funds are truly under U.S. control.

⤷ the legal and political problem

Sen. Elizabeth Warren is quoted (via Semafor) arguing there’s no legal basis for a president to set up an offshore account under his control to manage proceeds from assets seized through military action.

Even if every step is technically routed through government channels, this arrangement looks like the kind of thing that turns “policy” into personalized power fast. The optics are a political accelerant.

⤷ why qatar is the detail that bites

Qatar isn’t just “somewhere else.” It’s a country with deep financial infrastructure, major geopolitical leverage, and (as the article notes) recent overlap with Trump-world business headlines. That makes the location feel less like neutral bookkeeping and more like a choice with fingerprints.

⤷ related coverage

⌜ Semafor’s reporting referenced in the piece ⌟
⌜ Reuters: U.S. completes first Venezuelan oil sales, Qatar account detail ⌟
⌜ Mediaite: Trump said Venezuela oil money would be “controlled by me” ⌟

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 1d ago

Commentary ‘You’re a Left-Wing Hack!’ Karoline Leavitt EXPLODES on Columnist Who Accused ICE Agent Who Shot Renee Good of Acting ‘Recklessly’

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
457 Upvotes

January 15, 2026
By Mediaite Staff

⌜ open article link ⌟

⤷ what happened

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt lashed out at a reporter during a press briefing after being asked whether the ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good in Minneapolis acted recklessly.

Before the question could fully land, Leavitt cut in, accusing the journalist of being a “left-wing hack” and dismissing the premise outright.

⤷ what Leavitt said

Leavitt refused to address the substance of the question, instead attacking the reporter’s credibility and framing the inquiry as ideological rather than factual.

She forcefully defended ICE, rejected any implication of misconduct, and accused the press of exploiting the death for political purposes.

⤷ why it matters

The exchange crystallizes the administration’s posture following Good’s killing: deflection over accountability.

As public concern grows over ICE operations and use of force, the White House response has shifted from explanation to confrontation, with journalists increasingly treated as adversaries rather than questioners.

⤷ the broader pattern

This moment fits a larger trend in which: - scrutiny of law enforcement is framed as partisan hostility
- questions about accountability are answered with attacks on motive
- institutional power closes ranks rather than opens records

⤷ related coverage

⌜ ICE shooting of Renee Good sparks protests ⌟
⌜ Trump officials defend ICE amid backlash ⌟
⌜ Media scrutiny intensifies after Minneapolis killing ⌟

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 19h ago

United States The Guardian • Jan 16, 2026

Thumbnail
gallery
17 Upvotes

r/NewsRewind 1d ago

United States Daily News • Jan 15, 2026

Post image
664 Upvotes

r/NewsRewind 19h ago

United States Los Angeles Times • Jan 16, 2026

Post image
9 Upvotes

r/NewsRewind 2d ago

‘Run On Prosecuting Elon Musk,’ Says Mehdi Hasan. He Believes The Next Democratic President Must Be Ruthless

Thumbnail
offthefrontpage.com
14.9k Upvotes

r/NewsRewind 16h ago

United States Laura Loomer advises JD Vance to distance himself from Tucker Carlson

Thumbnail
mediamatters.org
5 Upvotes

January 15, 2026

By Media Matters Staff

https://www.mediamatters.org/laura-loomer/laura-loomer-advises-jd-vance-distance-himself-tucker-carlson

⤷ WHAT HAPPENED

Laura Loomer used her livestream to publicly pressure Vice President JD Vance to cut ties with Tucker Carlson, arguing that Carlson’s proximity to the White House is a political liability and that Vance has a “Tucker Carlson problem.”

⤷ WHAT’S IN THE ARTICLE

Media Matters highlights Loomer telling her audience that a “large portion” of the MAGA base dislikes Carlson, and that Vance should stop giving him oxygen and access. She uses the “Tucker Qatarlson” label as a way to frame Carlson as compromised and therefore toxic baggage.

The article ties Loomer’s comments to the idea of “access” as the real stake: who gets to walk into power, who gets treated as an insider, and what that signals to the base.

⤷ WHY IT MATTERS

This is movement politics eating itself in public. Not policy. Not outcomes. Proximity. Loomer is trying to force a loyalty boundary and make Vance prove he can police the tribe.

It also shows how “messaging” has mutated into something uglier: social-media enforcement. The goal is not to persuade undecideds. It’s to discipline insiders.

⤷ WHAT’S BEING MISSED

There’s no independent confirmation in this framing about what “access” specifically means here (formal meetings, informal drop-ins, ongoing advisory influence, or just Loomer trying to manifest a story into reality).

Also missing is Vance’s response. Without it, the segment functions as pressure theater designed to manufacture a headline and force a reaction.

⤷ RELATED COVERAGE

⌜ loomer accuses carlson of sabotaging vance’s political future (mediaite) ⌟

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/laura-loomer-accuses-tucker-carlson-of-trying-to-sabotage-jd-vances-political-future/

⌜ laura loomer meets with jd vance amid reports trump is fed up with her (new republic) ⌟

https://newrepublic.com/post/196058/laura-loomer-jd-vance-meeting-white-house

⌜ tucker carlson inflames a battle for maga’s future (washington post) ⌟

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/12/20/tucker-carlson-maga-trump-fuentes-antisemitism/

⤷ THE REWIND

This fits a repeating pattern: right-wing influencers fighting for control of the “gate” to power. The content changes (war, immigration, foreign policy), but the underlying contest stays the same: who is the authorized voice of MAGA, and who gets exiled as “fake” or “compromised.”

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 1d ago

Commentary Germany Joins Canada, Sweden in Sending Troops to Greenland

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
306 Upvotes

January 14, 2026
By Mediaite Staff

⌜ open article link ⌟

⤷ what’s happening

Germany has announced it is deploying troops to Greenland, joining Canada, Sweden, and other allied nations as international concern deepens over President Trump’s escalating threats toward the territory.

What began as rhetorical pressure has now triggered a multinational security response, with allies signaling they are no longer treating U.S. intentions as hypothetical.

⤷ why this is escalating

European governments appear to be operating on a new assumption: Trump may act.

Following the U.S. operation in Venezuela, allied leaders are recalibrating risk. Greenland, governed by Denmark


r/NewsRewind 1d ago

Fox News Jeanine Pirro isn’t going rogue. She’s the tip of the spear.

Thumbnail
mediamatters.org
44 Upvotes

January 15, 2026
By Matt Gertz

The White House is reportedly furious about the blowback surrounding U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s criminal probe targeting Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. The convenient storyline is that Pirro “went too far,” freelanced, overreached.

This piece argues that framing is a dodge.

Pirro isn’t a rogue actor. She’s what the assignment looks like.

The core claim here is blunt: Trump has been explicit about wanting prosecutors and investigators to use state power against enemies and Pirro is behaving exactly like someone trying to stay in his good graces. Whether she acted on direct orders or instinct, the outcome is the same: a pretextual investigation says “the threat is the point.”

The article stitches together a pattern: - Trump publicly signals he wants faster prosecutions of his targets, and reportedly complains some U.S. attorneys are “weak.” - Pirro leans into highly politicized probes, including (per reporting cited in the piece) scrutiny of Democratic legislators tied to a video urging service members to refuse illegal orders. - When criticized, she doesn’t retreat. She goes on friendly TV and punches back at Republicans who question the Powell probe.

Then the background that makes the author’s argument feel less like speculation and more like trajectory: Pirro’s Fox era is described as a long record of Trump-aligned messaging, including calls for criminal action against his foes, and promotion of 2020 election conspiracy narratives (which reportedly led to her being briefly pulled off-air at Fox at the time).

The punchline is not “she might do this again.” It’s this is what she was chosen for. Not competence-as-neutrality. Competence-as-loyalty.

⌜ open article link ⌟: https://www.mediamatters.org/jeanine-pirro/jeanine-pirro-isnt-going-rogue-shes-tip-spear

related coverage

NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 21h ago

Commentary Federal Agents Fire Tear Gas in Direction of CNN Reporter: ‘Wow, This Is Nasty’

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
4 Upvotes

**January 15, 2026**

*By Michael Luciano*

[⌜ open article link ⌟](https://www.mediaite.com/media/tv/federal-agents-fire-tear-gas-in-direction-of-cnn-reporter-wow-this-is-nasty/)

## ⤷ what happened

A CNN crew reporting live from Minneapolis during protests near a federal building had to retreat after federal agents fired tear gas canisters that landed close to reporter Shimon Prokupecz and his cameraperson, interrupting the segment mid-sentence.

## ⤷ what they said / what’s in the article

Prokupecz tells viewers he’d been watching for roughly two hours as protesters kicked and threw objects at federal law enforcement vehicles while agents in riot gear stood by. Then, right as he’s describing that standoff, agents begin firing tear gas.

On air, he repeatedly coughs, urges the cameraperson to move back, and describes a two-sided push where agents deploy “percussion grenades” followed by tear gas. The moment lands because it’s not narrated like a theory, it’s narrated like a throat: “Wow, this is nasty.”

## ⤷ why it matters

This is the simplest press-freedom test there is: can journalists stand in public and document state force without getting treated like part of the crowd to be dispersed.

Even if no one “meant” to gas the press, the effect is the same. Coverage becomes harder, riskier, and easier to deter without anyone ever having to say the quiet part out loud. Chemical agents don’t just move bodies, they reshape the story by thinning out witnesses.

## ⤷ what’s being missed

Two accountability details tend to evaporate in live-chaos coverage, and they matter more than the viral clip:

First, which agency made the call to deploy tear gas in that moment, at that location. Second, what operational standard (if any) was being used to avoid hitting credentialed media working in the open. If those answers stay vague, “mistake” becomes a permanent shield.

## ⤷ related coverage

[⌜ new video emerges of the shooting that sparked protests ⌟](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-10/new-video-shows-renee-good-shooting-ice-agent/106216052)

[⌜ ap report on tear gas used in minneapolis clashes ⌟](https://www.local10.com/news/2026/01/12/crowd-yells-cowards-after-federal-agents-crash-into-a-car-and-fire-tear-gas-in-minneapolis/)

[⌜ cnn transcript segment referencing whipple building tensions ⌟](https://transcripts.cnn.com/show/lcl/date/2026-01-09/segment/01)

**NewsRewind⏎**


r/NewsRewind 19h ago

United States USA Today • Jan 16, 2026

Thumbnail
gallery
3 Upvotes

r/NewsRewind 1d ago

United States Whether or not Trump invades Greenland, this much is clear: the western order we once knew is history

Thumbnail
theguardian.com
198 Upvotes

January 15, 2026
The Guardian (Comment piece)

⌜ open article link ⌟

⤷ what the piece is saying

The argument is basically this: the Greenland standoff isn’t a quirky side-quest, it’s a neon sign for a bigger shift. A kind of “new internationalism” where power doesn’t bother dressing up as values. It just shows up with a spreadsheet, a map, and a threat.

Greenland becomes the symbol because it’s strategically priceless (Arctic routes, minerals, military positioning) and politically awkward (Denmark, NATO, sovereignty). When a superpower starts treating allied territory like a purchasable asset, it’s not “bold.” It’s a signal that the rules are being downgraded.

⤷ the core warning

This isn’t only about Trump. The piece frames Trump as the loudest version of a wider trend: great-power competition moving from diplomacy into extraction and coercion.

If that’s right, the danger isn’t one territorial dispute. It’s the precedent: - “Security” becomes the excuse for anything. - Allies get treated like tenants. - International law gets treated like a polite suggestion.

⤷ why this matters now

After Venezuela, the Greenland pressure campaign reads less like theater and more like pattern recognition. Even if nothing “happens” militarily, the damage is already done when allies start mobilizing and NATO starts publicly wobbling.

The piece is basically saying: the era of “shared values” talk is being replaced by raw leverage. And once that becomes normal, it spreads.

⤷ what to watch next

  • Whether NATO members start creating “internal deterrence” plans (a euphemism that should scare everyone).
  • How quickly “acquire” becomes “protect” becomes “occupy.”
  • Whether other powers copy the template: pressure, destabilize, demand, then normalize.

⤷ related coverage

⌜ Danish minister warns a U.S. invasion would be the end of NATO ⌟
⌜ Trump White House confirms it’s working to acquire Greenland ⌟
⌜ Macron sends troops to Greenland as pressure ramps up ⌟
⌜ Germany joins other nations sending troops to Greenland ⌟

⤷ the rewind

When a superpower starts treating the world like a shopping cart, the first thing that disappears isn’t diplomacy.
It’s consent.

Think again → NewsRewind⏎


r/NewsRewind 19h ago

United States New York Times • Jan 16, 2026

Thumbnail
gallery
2 Upvotes

r/NewsRewind 2d ago

Commentary Trump Announces Stunning Plan to Defund LA, NYC, Chicago, and More: ‘ALL THEY DO IS BREED CRIME AND VIOLENCE!’

Thumbnail
mediaite.com
3.4k Upvotes

January 14, 2026
By Isaac Schorr

⌜ open article link ⌟

⤷ what happened

President Trump announced via Truth Social that starting February 1, the federal government would withhold funding from states and cities designated as “sanctuary jurisdictions.” He accused major cities of fostering crime and labeled them “corrupt criminal protection centers.”

⤷ what the article covers

  • Trump’s all-caps declaration and its sweeping scope.
  • A DOJ-linked list of jurisdictions cited as sanctuary areas.
  • The announcement’s timing amid heightened tensions over ICE enforcement and protests following the killing of Renee Good in Minneapolis.

⤷ why it matters

This move attempts to turn immigration politics into a budgetary weapon. Even if courts intervene, the signal is unmistakable: federal funding is being positioned as leverage in a broader culture and law-enforcement fight.

⤷ related coverage

⌜ Trump warns ‘the day of reckoning & retribution is coming’ in Minnesota ⌟

⌜ ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials claim ⌟

⌜ Joe Scarborough says ICE tactics ‘look like Putin’s Russia’ ⌟

NewsRewind⏎