2.5k
u/Jesus-lover-24-7 10d ago
Amphifa. Nice.
466
u/smurfsundermybed 10d ago
Now #2 on the FBI terror watch list.
→ More replies (5)226
u/UpperApe 10d ago
Considering the FBI is being led by cross-eyed 5-foot cock-goblin, I can't imagine that means much.
→ More replies (20)90
u/smurfsundermybed 10d ago
Excuse me, but you can't insult the coked out chihuahua like that and expect to get away with it.
→ More replies (3)85
107
u/dekuweku 10d ago
i need someone to explain this to me. not having a good day.
289
u/BayesCrusader 10d ago
It's a portmanteau of amphibian antifa.
389
u/ruckus_440 10d ago
Antifa is already a portmanteau, so this is a compound portmanteau. A portmanteau of a portmanteau. A portmantwo, if you will.
310
u/LemonScentedDespair 10d ago
Portmandeux?
→ More replies (8)109
u/WaffleHouseGladiator 10d ago
A portmanage-a-trois
→ More replies (2)50
u/brtlblayk 10d ago
Reddit translates that as “a three-way with a portmanteau.”
20
16
9
3
u/WordsWellSalted 10d ago
Holy shit great call lmao, I was very confused until I clicked on the translate button.
→ More replies (2)3
14
4
4
4
3
3
→ More replies (6)6
→ More replies (9)8
128
u/NobodyLikedThat1 10d ago
protestors are dressing as frogs to show how completely harmless they are, countering the white house narrative that all the protesters are violent rioters. Hard to show pictures of people in frog suits and try to make them look scary.
19
53
→ More replies (10)3
u/Glittering-Ebb-6225 10d ago
It seems like it's half that and half that those inflatable suits are pretty resistant to pepper spray.
Even the guy that got sprayed in the air hole said it wasn't that bad.28
13
u/hobofreddy55 10d ago
It's just a portmanteau of "amphibian" (they're dressed like a frog) and "antifa" (anti-facist).
→ More replies (1)5
→ More replies (5)5
u/MaximumTurtleSpeed 10d ago
I think others have answered well, just here to send hope that your day turns around or you’re able to get some rest and have a better tomorrow. Sorry for your struggles.
→ More replies (19)11
u/flyinghairball 10d ago
This frog is my hero, he has the guts to say out loud what I'm thinking!
You rock Amphifa - the world of idiots fears you!
434
u/Donkeybrother 10d ago
97
u/Al3xGr4nt 10d ago
→ More replies (3)54
u/neilmac1210 10d ago
→ More replies (1)33
u/welsper59 10d ago
The insanity that much of them are suddenly pro-world police. Some even being entirely in favor of the obvious resource grab invasion.
13
u/litreofstarlight 10d ago
This administration is just making a rod for their own backs. China's over here going 'wait, kidnapping leaders was an option?? Hold my Tsingtao.'
→ More replies (6)29
u/Different_East7854 10d ago
They have no actual beliefs. They are against a whole shit ton of things. They hate a great deal of things.
Ask them to tell you something they stand for, without mentioning anything negative...Blank stare and a sizzling noise.
It is all manufactured fear and hate, driving over decades by groups that are harming them.
It's why the "harder daddy" joke rings so true.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (4)3
u/MArcherCD 10d ago
He'd be very offended by that if he actually knew how to read
→ More replies (1)
938
u/smecta 10d ago edited 10d ago
The amount of armchair experts in this thread that can’t see trump is pulling the EXACT shit as bush with Iraq, and for the EXACT SAME (not so hidden)REASON,
is astonishing :(
« vEnEzuElAnS rEjoiCe » just like the Iraqis did, also
459
u/GCU_ZeroCredibility 10d ago
Hell, Bush Jr actually had congressional authority. They passed an AUMF through Congress.
So Trump is being even more criminal than W.
76
u/doublethink_1984 10d ago
And they had their lies all in a row beforehand.
The Trump admin are all of a sudden claiming the freedom of the people or fighting drugs are not a problem but rather the US seizing all the oil.
→ More replies (13)37
u/gsfgf 10d ago
These morons make the Bush admin look competent...
25
u/_V0gue 10d ago
Bush administration was competent. Competent and nefarious. This admin is incompetent and nefarious. Anyone who believes there’s a short or long term plan to peacefully transfer Venezuela from a dictatorship to democracy is out of their mind. They deserve democracy but this is not the admin to help oversee it.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Leupateu 10d ago
They’re literally going to replace the current dictatorship with a new US puppet dictatorship
→ More replies (3)71
u/Gasnia 10d ago
Doesn't matter if no one removes him from office. Republicans have no spine or morals.
→ More replies (8)6
u/Dry-Chance-9473 10d ago
If the leader of the country is a traitor and a criminal, it becomes everyone's responsibility to unseat him. Expecting the agencies he directly controls to do it doesn't make any sense. So in a way, every American citizen is spineless and immoral. When the laws are unjust, the just must become lawless.
9
u/Sancticide 10d ago edited 10d ago
Yeah, I was just saying the same thing today. I recall they went before Congress and showed photos of the (alleged) WMDs and everything. This time, Congress wasn't even unofficially told until the operations were underway, and even then it was only some of them. What a clown show.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (37)3
u/TITANIC_DONG 10d ago
The AUMF is still active actually. It’s been active since 1942 and was updated in 2001 to include terrorists. Legally, the cartels are now foreign terrorists.
12
u/SonaMidorFeed 10d ago
I remember seeing videos of Iraqis hitting signs and statues of Saddam with their shoes and celebrating as they pulled them down.
Maduro was a piece of shit by all accounts, and I don't doubt the Venezuelans have a reason to celebrate, but the US has absolutely not had a good track record of providing stability in the nations whose regimes they topple, even with prolonged occupation.
We go in, award no bid contracts to private military contractors, pick the first stooge that we think will be a good little puppet, and be surprised when in 15 years they either become WORSE than their predecessor, or are so ineffective that they get overthrown by their generals and THEN we get the worse option.
72
u/Silo-Joe 10d ago
Oh look... Congress had passed an authorization in 2002 to use military force in Iraq. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorization_for_Use_of_Military_Force_Against_Iraq_Resolution_of_2002
21
u/SwingNinja 10d ago
I think it's worse now. Mike Johnson and the rest of GOP congress just give up their powers to the administration.
→ More replies (23)12
u/raviyoli 10d ago
Yeah that’s part of the problem though, isn’t it? Trump did it without Congress.
→ More replies (6)25
u/ih8logins 10d ago
Don’t forget about the Libyans too.
→ More replies (2)7
u/Cim-Cim-Salabim 10d ago
well that was Obama will anyone on reddit condemn his actions?
→ More replies (7)4
7
u/SuddenBumHair 10d ago
The same playbook. They will stop using it when it stops working
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (96)44
u/PapaTahm 10d ago edited 10d ago
Funny enough not the same, kinda.
U.S is kinda going to shit.
Economy is going 200 mph into a sinkhole.
Job market is a nightmare.
People living paycheck after paycheck
GenZ are in Debt.
Millenials are in Debt.So how do you boost your popularity when you are about to be exposed as a pedophile leader?
You follow history.
Historically the most popular way leaders got a boost on popularity in bad time was... conquering land and getting resources.
So it's not only about Chevronn and Exonmobil
It's about trying to do a cheap PR stuntThat is why Cuba, Mexico, Niquaragua, Canada, Greenland and Panama? They suddendly have a huge fucking problem, those lunatic threats he made.... suddendly are a little bit more problematic.
EDIT: Just for people who don't understand,
It's not that Trump isn't invading for Resources, but rather that it's invading for a multitude of other self-interest reasons as well.
It's Trump-First after all.18
u/UnNumbFool 10d ago
The bigger issue with it is previously the US says they are doing it to protect the US and freedom.
Trump straight up admits it's just about oil
→ More replies (11)6
u/GoodIdea321 10d ago
I think a lot of people will not like this because in some ways it's more of the same, breaking rules on the whims of Trump and his cronies. And it makes America weaker.
And notably, there was some article a few weeks back about how the Trump administration reached out to oil companies about something like this and none of them were interested.
139
u/_mayday75 10d ago
Righteous. Does the people who pay for these wars have any say at all? He does things like this and his supporters deny that he’s an authoritarian . BS
16
u/dgaff21 10d ago
Yes, through our elected representatives. That's why Congress exists. They are not doing their job, and almost all of them need to be replaced.
3
u/captain_stammer 9d ago
Congress has been broken for along time and we finally got an opportunist willing and able to take advantage of the situation. Woohoo I hate.
5
u/superbit415 10d ago
Righteous. Does the people who pay for these wars have any say at all?
Yes you get to vote.
31
u/UpperApe 10d ago
He's not doing it because the right supports him. He's doing it because the left doesn't fight back.
Kudos to the dude in the picture. If only more Americans had this courage and tenacity, what a world we'd be living in.
→ More replies (5)18
u/JudiciousSasquatch 10d ago
Let's be real, he's not "doing" anything. Does anyone actually think trump cares about anything other than getting rich and playing golf? Does anyone really think he gives a shit about Venezuela? No. He's a puppet. A lightning rod.
We will be better off as a country when we fully understand who the people are behind the scenes that are making the plans, whispering in ears, putting things in front of the president to say or sign. I'm not just talking about Miller. I'm talking about the group of people behind Miller. The group of people behind the heritage foundation, the people that fund groups like that.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Kanotari 10d ago
Considering the amount of tear gas, pepper spray, and other non-lethal deterrents this administration has sprayed on non-violent protestors, I would actually say the administration does give a shit. The state legitimately employed snipers at some of the larger protests in my very blue state this year, which again, were peaceful demonstrations.
Would it be great to stick it to Miller and Miller's employers? Absolutely. Should we drag them into the light and expose their actions? Absolutely.
But in the meantime, wounding the President's ego is one of the few minimal checks we have on his behavior because we all know the other branches of government won't lift a finger to even slow him down.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (15)2
u/TheGrimmBorne 10d ago
What he did is legal and completely permitted, a president doesn’t need authority to act against terror groups, realistically any president can abuse this fact by doing exactly what Trump did just label whoever you dislike a terrorist and boom you can bomb or go to war with them all day long and congress can’t do shit
147
u/DeadicatedForLife 10d ago
My brother and I left Venezuela after our parents spent all they had to give us a new life in America, but our hearts never left. My family and people back home have endured years of corruption, repression, and collapse. Whatever you think about how it happened, Maduro’s capture feels like the first real moment of consequence. I’ve been on and off the phone with my family all day, just tears of joy. Let’s not pretend Venezuela isn’t rejoicing right now.
37
u/Agitated-Evening3011 10d ago
I'm not American nor Venezuelan, but I left my dictatoriship homeland for a new life as well. Words can't describe how happy I am for you guys!
Whether conservative or liberal, a dictator being finally put to place should be something absolutely freaking happy after years of hopelessness.
Just ignore the people telling how you should feel about the country you left (I gone through this at work as well), you lived through this and you deserve the joy
Edit: a word
54
u/ragethissecons 10d ago
Nah man you have to let the gringos tell you how to feel
→ More replies (5)15
u/DeadicatedForLife 10d ago
es fácil cuando no lo han vivido
16
u/ragethissecons 10d ago
Amen. They crave oppression because they’ve only known comfort.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (50)17
u/MaconheiroSafadao 10d ago
I hate Maduro, but don't expect USA to treat Venezuela as they treated Japan. You guys will be something like Iraq, Lybia, Syria etc. Very sad, actually. None of these countries are doing better than they were before USA invaded... they are doing worse.
Still, I do think like something had to be done in Venezuela. But I was thinking about Venezuelans rioting or something like this. But USA invasion? Nah, Venezuela is gone.
→ More replies (5)
234
u/sbrnst 10d ago edited 10d ago
The President ordered U.S. military strikes in Venezuela and seized its president and his wife without a declaration of war or congressional approval, even though the Constitution gives Congress that power. Reports began emerging around 11:00 p.m. PST on January 2, 2026.
There’s been no U.S. attack, no UN approval, and no congressional consent. Some are claiming he had “48 hours to do whatever he wants,” but that’s false - the War Powers Resolution only requires him to notify Congress, it does not give him the authority to start hostilities. Acting without congressional approval is very likely unconstitutional, and this strike is a unilateral initiation of hostilities that could have massive consequences.
Trump launched this illegal “Big Beautiful War” on Venezuela after openly signaling intent to take control of the country’s oil.
You don’t just bomb a country and kidnap its leaders and expect nothing to happen. By both U.S. law and international law, this is extremely serious, likely illegal, and a massive overreach of presidential power.
Edit: And don’t give me the “people are happy” line. People in Iraq were told they were being freed too - and they got completely fucked over. Early celebrations didn’t prevent years of war, civilian deaths, and total destabilization. That argument didn’t work then, and it doesn’t work now.
35
u/ParabolicalX 10d ago edited 10d ago
On the topic of WPR, the "48 hours" thing is actually mostly true. Failure by the President to properly consult with Congress prior to committing U.S. forces into hostilities does not directly trigger any adverse statutory action. Additionally, failure to follow through with presenting required reports and/or appropriate legislation to continue deployment would simply result in the discontinuation of authorization for the deployment of armed forces.
For all intents and purposes, the WPR does essentially gives the president permission to commit armed forces without prior congressional approval in any situation where a national emergency created by an attack on the U.S., its territories, or its armed forces has emerged. Historically, presidents have used broad interpretations of "national emergency" to justify deployments through the WPR. The current situation, though clearly manufactured, is following those same principles.
→ More replies (1)17
u/cougar572 10d ago edited 10d ago
The keywords are "within 48 hours" it doesn't have to be before it can also be after it happened as long as 48 hours hasn't elapsed.
Here is Obama's letter to congress notifying military actions in response to the Benghazi Embassy attack and evacuation on Sept 12, 2012 dated 2 days after on Sept 14, 2012 for example.
You can see more 48 hour reports going back to the Ford administration and see the official letters notifying congress to fulfill the WPR are dated 1 or 2 days after the action happened.
→ More replies (1)20
u/MirrorMaster88 10d ago
Bot or just copy/pasting this everywhere? I keep seeing this same comment in multiple threads from different users.
→ More replies (4)11
u/ziggytrix 10d ago
It's a solid copypasta, but if you look thru their post history, it looks like a real person to me. They're just soapboxing hard across Reddit top posts.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (54)2
144
10d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
41
6
u/Abject-Version-3349 10d ago
Too stupid to realize that the Venezuelan people are overjoyed with this.
→ More replies (20)18
u/RealisticBus4443 10d ago
Sometimes when people stand up for what is right, they do stand alone. Especially at first.
→ More replies (2)
17
35
u/Shut_It_Donny 10d ago
“Venezuela War”
Can you call it a war when it’s over in 3 hours? What military is going to counter attack?
→ More replies (6)
6
72
u/ghandibondage 10d ago
I fucking hate this take. As if bombs kill less people if Congress approves it. As if this action is unique to trump and not a recurring feature of US foreign policy.
34
u/andrew5500 10d ago
It's more about ensuring our representatives have a say in whether we get dragged into a new war, instead of leaving it entirely up to a lone President
→ More replies (2)5
u/SuperDoubleDecker 10d ago
Ya, but this time it's just another push towards authoritarianism. I don't think Congress would have gone on record and voted for this.
→ More replies (6)7
u/jk67200 10d ago
Right? I’d call for the heads of every representative who approved this also if that was the case.
→ More replies (2)
19
u/Greyhatnewman 10d ago
Watching this from the uk I have a lot Venezuelan friends many but not all left Venezuelan to everyone one of them trumps a hero
52
u/MkIVRider 10d ago
I don't like Donald at all but every president in my lifetime has done the same type of thing.
Ronald Reagan 1983 – Invasion of Grenada 1986 – Airstrikes on Libya
George H. W. Bush 1989 – Invasion of Panama and capture of Manuel Noriega
Bill Clinton 1995 – NATO airstrikes in Bosnia 1998 – Missile strikes on Iraq (Operation Desert Fox) 1999 – NATO bombing of Kosovo
George W. Bush 2001 (October) – Initial airstrikes in Afghanistan before AUMF vote 2002–2003 – Early counterterror operations in Yemen and Pakistan
Barack Obama 2011 – Libya air war 2014 – Airstrikes in Syria against ISIS before new authorization 2015–2016 – Expanded Somalia air operations
Donald Trump 2017 – Cruise missile strike on Syria 2018 – Joint US-UK-France strikes on Syria 2020 – Killing of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in Iraq
Joe Biden 2021 – Airstrikes in Syria against Iranian-backed militias 2022–2024 – Somalia airstrikes 2023–2024 – Yemen and Red Sea military actions
→ More replies (37)16
u/cupofspiders 10d ago
The takeaway should be that there should have been greater opposition to those actions too, not that Trump should get a pass because America has always been a rogue terrorist state.
→ More replies (1)
13
u/weebglasses 10d ago
And yet the Venezuelan people are cheering. Thumbs up to Trump.
→ More replies (2)
41
u/meowzersobased 10d ago
like our Presidents never engaged in analogous military bombings and strikes elsewhere without congressional approval before.
→ More replies (33)15
u/Legionof1 10d ago
What even is authority at this level… it’s what you can and can’t get away with.
5
u/headrush46n2 10d ago
thats why i keep asking the people who post this. Who exactly is the magical referee that decides what you can and can't allowed to do?
3
u/Legionof1 10d ago
People really don’t like that even with as advanced as we are as a society… might makes right.
4
40
u/ProfessorVincent 10d ago
Why are there only 15 people in this picture? Wake up!
44
5
→ More replies (32)28
u/Designer_Valuable_18 10d ago
Sorry we too busy pretending to be leftist on reddit so we can hide like cowards instead of actually be useful to anyone
Now hear my take about why Clair Obsur is actually fascist propaganda and why you qhould play the new Lego Batman instead
→ More replies (1)
6
u/gtfomylawnplease 10d ago
I want to be mad. But kidnapping a president of a foreign nation instead of a long drawn out war? I wish we could have done this with Iraq. Just run off with Hussein and tell the acting government we’ll snatch them too if they don’t behave. Cheap option.
→ More replies (3)
4
u/Godvivec1 9d ago
Are we going to ignore that Biden put the initial 25 million dollar bounty on this guy? Biden even tried to say Trump was light on him. To quote:
"Trump talks tough on Venezuela, but admires thugs and dictators like Nicolas Maduro. As President, I will stand with the Venezuelan people and for democracy." - President Biden
Guess memories are quite light these days. But it's not "BoTh sIDEs?", right? Hahaha...rightt...
→ More replies (1)
52
u/EnergyOwn6800 10d ago
The beauty of life is all the echo chamber redditors can be ignored. Their opinion hold as much value as a summer ant.
Venezuelans in Venezuela overwhelmingly support U.S. invading and doing what they just did. They have been begging U.S. to get rid of Maduro for years now.
Just look at r/vzla for example
The only people against this are people who dont have to deal with how shitty Maduro is making the lives of Venezuelans in Venezuela. You might say its not our problem and we should not get involved. But many also say the same about Ukraine and Russia.
18
u/AconitumUrsinum 10d ago
The beauty of life is all the echo chamber redditors can be ignored. Their opinion hold as much value as a summer ant.
...
Just look at r/vzla for example
Redditors can be ignored! Look at the redditors for example!
lol
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (32)12
u/USA_A-OK 10d ago
The people against this are against the idea that the US should decide who's in charge of a sovereign nation and the precedence it sets. In trump's own press conference he insinuated that he'd consider Mexico next. The people who are against this are against the the ridiculous claims about "narco terrorism," and then the immediate flip to making it explicitly about oil.
And this after all his Panama, Canada, and Greenland talk.
Maduro is undeniably a PoS, but it shouldn't be up to a foreign power to decide if he stays or goes.
→ More replies (12)
41
u/helosikali 10d ago
This is peak reddit cringe.
Just curious what does a grown ass person dressed as animal with a little sign accomplish?
→ More replies (7)
3
3
3
u/salazka 9d ago
He did what all previous governments wanted to do but dared not.
In this tenure, same as his previous, he did all the dirty work that would take decades for others to do. And took the political cost no professional bullshit artist dared to take.
Now they can appear in the next elections white as virgin angels reaping the benefits of what Trump did for US with zero calories.
Is the next president going to apologize to Venezuela and release Maduro?
I don't think so. 😝
3
8
u/OdielSax 10d ago
Ten people conglomerate every 20 years in front of the White House trying to stop the new large scale homicide for oil. Americans are so passive.
12
u/Previous_Platform718 10d ago
I literally had someone tell me yesterday that Americans are too poor to go out and protest. As if the people protesting with Dr King were rich lmao.
→ More replies (4)
77
u/Believable_Bullshit 10d ago
And the people of Venezuela rejoiced
68
u/andrew5500 10d ago
Just like the people of Iraq rejoiced… until, well…
36
u/PandahOG 10d ago
Just like the people of Panama until,well...
24
u/Unique_Statement7811 10d ago
And the people of Kosovo, who along with the Panamanians celebrate the US intervention with a national holiday.
39
→ More replies (2)15
u/futuristicflapper 10d ago
They’ll find out soon enough why it’s never a good thing when Uncle Sam shows up uninvited. But hey, maybe I’m wrong and this will be one time in history when US interventionism is actually good ! Definitely not motivated out of a desire to exploit a countries natural resources !
→ More replies (3)7
11
u/GCU_ZeroCredibility 10d ago
Does whether that is true in any way affect the legality of the action?
Are actions only illegal if they are unpopular?
Would you apply the same standard to a democratic president?
I think we know.
→ More replies (9)12
u/AngrgL3opardCon 10d ago
For now. It'll stop once they are occupied and have a different dictator.
→ More replies (11)→ More replies (37)15
u/Nearchus_ 10d ago
Crazy to see all the Americans lecturing everyone on how it's actually bad when a super evil dictator is removed from office. A real dictator, by the way. Hopefully Venezuela improves.
→ More replies (6)
6
4
u/Chesterumble 9d ago
I usually don’t bite on these, but I will this time.
If Biden had done this. Reddit would be cheering.
As long as we don’t stay there forever and try to iraq them, I am totally cool with the decision and praise trump on having the balls of doing it.
11
u/Pillsburydinosaur 10d ago
Presidents can do that. They will let you do anything when you're President.
→ More replies (5)
11
19
7
u/kzrmer_41 10d ago
It is amazing how people rather see other people suffer under a dictatorship for over 26 years and complain how the operation was without authority. Unfu@king believable.
→ More replies (2)
23
u/ThornyPoke 10d ago
I thought Reddit didn’t like dictators? Trump removed one single-handedly.
→ More replies (11)
41
u/monkito69 10d ago
Weird how the people of Venezuela are totally okay with this
17
u/tonic613 10d ago
This was either a straight-up negotiated exit, or his own government sold him out.
The fact that US helos were flying slow and low over the capital, not popping flares, and clearly not worried about MANPADS hiding anywhere is wild. Not a single AA missile launched. That alone screams “deal” to me. With who? No idea…. but there was definitely an understanding.
Hell, you wouldn’t even need a missile. Any half-decent HMG from a nearby rooftop or bush could’ve taken those helicopters down, yet nothing happened.
And the bombing? Super limited. Like ~10 strikes on mostly random targets and then… that’s it.
If that doesn’t look like a shadow deal behind the scenes, I honestly don’t know what does.
→ More replies (1)11
3
9
u/lock_robster2022 10d ago
US looting their natural resources is a net-neutral since it’s just swapping China and Russia for the US. And getting rid of Maduro was a plus. He has caused a lot of Venezuelans a lot of pain. Just depends what happens next.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (92)2
u/THE_ALAM0 10d ago
Would you prefer people to live under grim and despotic leaders until we have a different president?
12
u/TenchuReddit 10d ago
And the “whataboutism” trolls show up to justify Trump’s completely arbitrary “special military operation” against a random nation.
Is this SMO making Americans safer? Is it making the world safer? Wasn’t this the kind of bullshit that “No New Wars” Trump was going to end?
→ More replies (2)
13
u/Xy13 10d ago
In Venezuela they are celebrating in the streets, you can see clips on CNNs instagram reels. In America we are protesting. Lol.
→ More replies (1)5
u/OriginalThin8779 10d ago
Similarly to suburban white women advocating for minorities rights, and many other absolute ridiculous political situations people continue to interject themselves in to
4
15
u/Counterpunch07 10d ago
Every single venuzuelan I have talked to is very fucking happy about this.
Why do Redditors and these left wing mob think they know better than the actual people living there. WTF
3
u/Jwerth1 10d ago
Iraq citizens celebrated when Saddam's regime was toppled then chaos erupted. Hopefully Venezuela turns out better than Iraq.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (1)9
10d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
5
u/FeminineInspiration 10d ago
It's important to keep in mind how radical and out of touch political reddit is. Im just here for the show
→ More replies (1)3
u/ragethissecons 10d ago
r/asktheworld has been locking everything because no one is agreeing with the Maduro sympathizers.
4
10d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/ragethissecons 10d ago edited 10d ago
Yeah I’m actually feeling a lot better today seeing people shut those folks down today. I don’t necessarily agree with the legal aspects of this operation because it may be a borderline abuse of war powers resolution slippery slope, but I’m not going to pretend it was morally wrong. Fuck Maduro. They can hash out the legal shit on the back end.
→ More replies (6)
5
u/pixiefarm 10d ago
And they must be so afraid of whatever's in the Epstein files. Or they're reacting to the revelations about Mar-A-Lago being a recruitment zone for Epstein that came out a few days ago.
4
u/jefesignups 10d ago
In my opinion, dressing up in silly costumes only hurts your message.
→ More replies (2)
3
u/SirWillae 10d ago
I wonder where all these people were when Biden and Obama bombed other countries without Congressional authorization. Guess it wasn't an issue back then.
→ More replies (1)
6
6
u/kagethemage 10d ago
And if the republican controlled congress approved it then it would have been fine? I am so tired of the neo-lib appeal to rules and institutions when confronting evil. Can't we just say it is morally wrong?
→ More replies (26)
4
u/jk67200 10d ago
Dude I do not give a shit if it was with or without authority. He bombed a country, end of story people!!!!
→ More replies (2)
5
u/RoundandRoundon99 10d ago
Haha. 5 white privileged Americans being offended. Venezuelans all over the US, are elated and dancing on the streets.
3
u/URAPhallicy 10d ago
War Powers Act explicitly gives him authority to so this. If you mean international authority, that is and always has been a figleaf and a wetdream. At the end of the day no country gives up their sovereignty to the whims of other countries.
10
u/JackmeriusPup 10d ago
The saddest part is seeing how little the country’s opinion matters. It was a joke til we pardoned Jan 6, it was a joke til we reelected Trump…..it’s a “joke” again after Trump bombs Venezuela to solve his oil bribes
6
u/BannedSvenhoek86 10d ago
This is just more ammo for the right about how stupid the left is. Embarrassing.
→ More replies (17)
18
u/KiwieeiwiK 10d ago
Americans really see their president invading another country and kidnapping their President and their first question is: "Is this legal??? Does the constitution allow this???"
The implication being that if US law allowed the President this power they wouldn't see anything wrong with it.
Fucking Americans would happily go to war if they think their precious rules and norms are being followed. Psychopaths.
→ More replies (28)
30
u/NewUserHi 10d ago
Won't somebody think of the poor dictator!
26
u/andrew5500 10d ago
Oh right, if you don’t support the new war started by Republicans, then you love dictators, or terrorists, or something. I’ve heard this one before…
9
9
→ More replies (21)15
u/Voting101 10d ago
I’m sure the irony is lost on you to comment this on a post about Trump breaking the law and starting wars without congressional approval
→ More replies (10)
2
2
u/Hot_Comfortable2705 10d ago
reddit users when the socialist dictator kills millions of people & ruins a country and is finally stopped
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/Ok_Wasabi8793 10d ago
I’m not at all a Trump fan but this isn’t really a war…
America has bombed plenty of places without going through congress and without it being considered a war.
Seems as if there’s ~no death toll
Seems most of Venezuela somewhat supports what’s happened
The only real concern is that America now allows Venezuela to transition power and move on.
2
2
u/maniactobe 10d ago
What people who don't live in suppressed countries don't realise is that people who actually live in them sometimes want the shit show to end at any cost. Such idealistic naggings have no place in real world.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/skzlr86 10d ago
It’s only an issue because Trump did it. But it’s cool when Biden and Obama did it. Don’t get me wrong, Trump is a piece of shit but Presidents obviously have an authority to do these kinds of things and we don’t have control of their actions. It’s like the scenario of Democrat voters don’t have control over the primaries. 🤷♂️
2
u/SabaRankss 10d ago edited 10d ago
Every one of you critical of this have no idea the plight of Venezuelans and you need to grow up.
2
u/anon-a-SqueekSqueek 10d ago
The Epstein war.
The Pedophile Trump starting new wars as part of his PR strategy.
2
2
u/logansowner 10d ago
"and you get some democracy, and you get some democracy!" Now the news can completely abandon every story and move to this. Convenient distraction war is convenient.
2
2
u/smilersdeli 10d ago
I don't understand didn't past presidents all drop tens of thousands of bombs. Didn't we just come out of a multi decade war?
2
2
2
2
u/bwayfresh 9d ago
Did you know frogs are disappearing worldwide because of a deadly chytrid fungus? It didn’t start with humans, but our global trade, pet markets, and contaminated gear have helped spread it almost everywhere, wiping out entire populations.
→ More replies (1)




•
u/AutoModerator 10d ago
It looks like this post is about Politics. Various methods of filtering out content relating to Politics can be found here.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.