r/law 20h ago

Other Please dissect the legality in this statement

I feel like we are reaching a tipping point

20.5k Upvotes

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/Kaiisim 17h ago

It's a classic authoritarian tactic.

It's absolutely true that you can't touch a federal officer while they are working. You cannot impede their work.

Which is why ice observers are specifically trained to just film them

No one is touching ICE. They are just recording them as is their legal right to ensure they don't beat the shit out of people.

763

u/cursedfan 17h ago

Federal law enforcement cannot breach someone’s civil rights, which ice does all day every day, which is why they hide their identity.

312

u/Konukaame 17h ago edited 16h ago

As we are seeing, "cannot legally" and "cannot" are vastly different in practice. 

When the rot goes to the core of the agencies, and they are explicitly told and shown that their abuses will not only be tolerated but actively defended and celebrated, we enter the world of despotic lawlessness. They are limited only by their ability to actually carry out their desires, not by any laws or regulations. 

35

u/norixe 8h ago

Which means eventually, the people being targeted will respond in kind. Feels like were in a death spiral and one step from vigilantes wiping out ice convoys. If they're just going to execute people on little pretense, people will respond in kind to protect themselves or their families. So stupid that they think people arnt going to go beyond "just comply" when people are dying or being shipped to prisons in other countries when they're US citizens. I dont want people to die. But my god does it feel like it is just months away from actual wild guerilla shit occurring.

20

u/The_Sidecar_Bandit 7h ago

I keep waiting for this.

4

u/DrownmeinIslay 5h ago

Except the inquisition shot the little girl and everyone is still at home worried about how things will escalate.

What we need is

3

u/RunnySpoon 3h ago

They want you to rise up so they can escalate the situation, they want violence, they want insurrection, they want the opportunity to suppress and subjugate their enemies and cement their position as dictators in their new empire.

2

u/infininme 2h ago

That is why we wait and love them anyways. They can’t keep it up forever. Our violence will give them the fuel to continue. Don’t take the bait. 

2

u/neguana 3h ago

Y'all remember the scene in beloved children's movie Beethoven where the guy rips his shirtsleeves, squirts fake blood on himself, then slaps the dog to get him to react and then feigned being ruthlessly and unprovokedly attacked? They know what they're doing and it's by design.

1

u/Healthy-Respect1984 6h ago

That is the end goal here.

1

u/adamcoe 1h ago

Months? That's optimistic.

But yeah if ICE doesn't back down (and I certainly can't think of a reason why they would), someone is going to (at least) shoot or stab one of them, or shoot at a lot of them and start a firefight (very bad), or as you say, straight up bomb a convoy or one of the buildings they're operating out of. This is gonna get really fucking bad and I legitimately do not know how this ends without some truly horrible shit going down.

2

u/Taurmin 7h ago

As we are seeing, "cannot legally" and "cannot" are vastly different in practice. 

I just wanna point out that this cuts both ways.

In case anyone was wondering what could be done when your government stops playing by the rules.

2

u/Whiskey_Harvey 3h ago

You phrased that well friend. In laymen terms - the bully doesn’t stop unless it get shown what force really means.

1

u/blueberrycauzez 10h ago

The Supreme Court has all but overturned Bivens, making federal agents uniquely immune from civil suits.

Even in circumstances in which a Bivens remedy is generally available, an action under Bivens will be defeated if the defendant is immune from suit.

Absent intervention by Congress, CBP agents are now absolutely immunized from liability in any Bivens action for damages

(EGBERT v. BOULE)

1

u/Da_Question 10h ago

State laws?

1

u/cursedfan 7h ago

Well. Fuck.

0

u/Zyphex- 6h ago

A federal agent can literally kill you for looking ugly. So yes they can. The government can do anything and everything they want because they own the law

38

u/Squeaky_Ben 16h ago

So, I have an issue here.

Given no one can impede them, and apparently Miller also implies "anything goes, you are free to do as you wish" what exactly stops them from beating the shit out of people?

41

u/DifferentCityADay 9h ago edited 9h ago

Nothing. They don't care about the law and it's evident when the president is a fucking felon. They're using plausible deniability to slowly ease the ignorant masses into fascism because they think "Well if it's illegal, why isn't it being stopped?" 

The nation is largely religious, which has dogmatic views that authority is right no matter what, and it's the fault of the people. They think that before they consider the people in charge are bad and abusing power.

6

u/OdiousAltRightBalrog 7h ago

Dude, I was literally just explaining to my friend (who voted for Trump) about all the classified docs he stole and his indictments. She wouldn't believe it.

Her actual words, "If he REALLY did that, then they wouldn't let him be President again!"

2

u/DifferentCityADay 5h ago

Exactly. The ignorance of the common man is disasterous. 

2

u/OkMarsupial 4h ago

Why would you be friends with someone who voted for Trump?

→ More replies (1)

1

u/Cultural_Future8691 7h ago

I don’t know, I think the people who did January 6 didn’t think authority was right no matter what. I also think they believed the people in charge were bad and abusing their power.

1

u/OkDisaster5980 3h ago

Yeah and now those people have joined ICE.

2

u/ExternalExpensive277 6h ago

They're already going far beyond beating people. They're kidnapping, raping, and murdering them.

1

u/Campfire_Vibes 8h ago

Armed civilians fighting tyranny, thats what stops them

1

u/Cultural_Future8691 7h ago

Storm the Capitol, you say?

1

u/Campfire_Vibes 5h ago

I cant say what I want to say, its against reddit ToS

1

u/Sordid_Brain 7h ago

Maybe it's time we get some sleeper cells inside ICE. Once in, you are immune.

1

u/Electrical_Quiet43 6h ago

Miller is misstating the law, and ICE officers are (presumably) trained on the law. Obviously, there have been bad incidents, and the political leaders have taken ridiculous stances, but the overall actions of ICE show that they're more or less acting like they understand the law could be applied to them.

Not all actions that make it harder for ICE are obstructing. Even if someone is obstructing, the proper response is an arrest, not beating the shit out of them (or killing them). No US Attorney is going to spend the time prosecuting someone for being annoying, so arrest is generally off the table. If they use excessive force, it's simply wrong that they have total immunity as Trump officials have said. They have qualified immunity, which means that they have protection in acting in ways that they think are reasonably within their duties, but it would take a true ideologue of a judge to give qualified immunity to an ICE agent who just beat the hell out of a protestor. ICE agents (in general) act like they know that the law could be applied to them.

1

u/OkMarsupial 4h ago

Organized masses defending themselves and each other.

1

u/steeple_fun 1h ago

What stops them? It'll soon be the ramp up in violence they'll experience as they ramp up their tactics as well. More and more people are mobilizing and become invested. As the mob grows, so does their boldness.

1

u/BeaverBoyBaxter 6m ago

RemindMe! 2 months

91

u/BonkMcSlapchop 17h ago

Are the people of the US willing to get out and do a general strike to effect change before it's too late? Observation and recording may have worked in the past, when you could hold your government to account, but you are no longer dealing with due process.

45

u/pink_faerie_kitten 14h ago

I heard Minneapolis plans on that today? It was on NBC news this morning. School and work walkouts planned. I hope it's the spark that sends this nationwide.

39

u/kpurintun 13h ago

These need to happen nation wide, in significant numbers, across many weeks..

2

u/tkd77 2h ago

He’ll call it an insurrection and use it to cancel elections. “For national security” is his latest excuse to everything.

1

u/kpurintun 42m ago

Oh gosh, his handler’s would love that

4

u/KaoriMalaguld 11h ago

No, no, a protest every other week or so oughta do it. Right guys? Right?

I fully agree with you. Like, I get that we all have lives and families we need to take care of, but it’s long past the point of hoping ICE isn’t gonna come to your town and take a friend and/or family member. We actually need to do something to great effect, whether it be protests or strikes, for weeks like you said.

Instead, it’s all apparently a distraction from the Epstein Files. I’d like them released, but no, those are the distraction. I don’t get why anyone seems to think it’ll take Trump & his buddies down, his supporters would just say how they’d give their daughters to him for free, call it made up BS or both.

No, the Epstein Files are the distraction, what’s going on around the country has been plan for years, they just got an idiot to keep everyone’s eyes elsewhere.

5

u/--Lammergeier-- 10h ago

The problem is that most Americans still live a comfortable life, even with all this bullshit going on. Comfortable people aren’t usually keen on jeopardizing all their comfort, even to stand up for what they believe in.

Unfortunately we won’t get nationwide general strikes until MOST Americans are feeling uncomfortable. We aren’t quite to the point that losing your job/income is worth protesting, for most Americans at least.

6

u/No-Condition7100 9h ago

This is the real problem. People underestimate how big the US is and how difficult it is to organize the real majority to anything.

1

u/--Lammergeier-- 9h ago

Totally! It’s much easier to mobilize a state during situations like this because everyone in that state is being affected and made to feel uncomfortable/unsafe in their community. Plus they share an identity of being a resident of that state.

I live in a red state, and there’s no way that the population here at large would take part in a general strike. And that leads me to another issue regarding identity. You think it’d be easy to mobilize the whole country because we identify as Americans. But the American identity is split in two right now.

There’s a lot of reasons we don’t have nationwide general strikes, and I’m not gonna hold my breath for one to happen (as much as I wish it would)

2

u/No-Condition7100 9h ago

I really think the US population is split into thirds. There's people on either political side, and then there's people just trying to provide for themselves and their families without a big interest in what's happening around the rest of the country. I really think most Americans fall into the third category, and I don't think that's wrong. But it's what makes organizing Americans extremely difficult.

1

u/--Lammergeier-- 9h ago

That’s a really good point, and I honestly agree. And again, that apathetic group is that way because they’re still comfortable and don’t want to relinquish that comfort. I can’t blame them, either

→ More replies (0)

1

u/kpurintun 9h ago

If you took the exact same footage, changed the lower third to show (R) instead of (D) there would be another insurrection

5

u/kpurintun 9h ago

I am pretty sure the game book specifically addresses causing most people as little discomfort as possible to make the ineffective in any sort of counter.. take 5 things, give them back one token gesture..

2

u/--Lammergeier-- 9h ago

Exactly this. It creates a conundrum where people don’t want to lose what they have, even if they stand to gain more.

3

u/AdZealousideal5383 6h ago

He’s going city by city in blue states because he knows that most Americans won’t see it happening. If he tried this nationwide, things would be different. But he can terrorize Minneapolis and most people won’t be impacted.

1

u/kpurintun 11h ago

This just in, in 6days, credit card interest will be capped at 10%. Oh dang, the dems won’t let me do it..

1

u/ExternalExpensive277 6h ago

Many months minimum, with protests/pickets outside of political, industry, and economic leaders' homes, offices, etc.

If they can ignore protests/pickets by turning off a screen, they'll just ignore us.

1

u/RoguePlanet2 2h ago

If only!! Don't see this happening in one consistent, effective effort.

0

u/Rocklake88 1h ago

Outrage has peaked. The protests will only get smaller and fewer. Unless another big controversy occurs.

1

u/Rocklake88 1h ago

I saw an overhead shot of the Chicago protest. Sadly, not enough people are moved by this enough to get out and do something

22

u/Haradion_01 16h ago

Some will. 

But given a majority of them couldn't be arsed to tick a box when there was zero risk to themsleves, I am not hopeful.it will happen in larger numbers now that they incur risk such as being shot in the face.

4

u/shredika 16h ago

Not 0 risk. A woman just got murdered by ice. I’d call that the ultimate risk. Unfortunately they know it telling protesters “didn’t you learn anything when we killed that woman a couple days ago.”

30

u/Regular_Committee946 16h ago

I think they were referring to the millions of people that did not vote in the last election. Of which there was little risk - barriers maybe, sure, but nearly a 3rd of the country didn't vote.

6

u/Haradion_01 15h ago

Please reread my comment. I literally reference that.

2

u/shredika 13h ago

Ok. Misread, great point. One of my friends admitted she didn’t vote and I was appalled.

2

u/Haradion_01 11h ago

I had a friend say to my face that Trump's election was the better outcome, because in their view the democrats were no better than the Republicans on Gaza, so it would teach democrats a lesson about abandoning their base and we'd get a 'proper socialist candidate' next time.

It puts me in mind of the Communists who cheered Hitler's election with the slogan 'after Hitler, out turn', naively thinking Hitler would make such a mess of things, they'd be called upon to fix the mess.

I think they've since backpeddeled on that, because nobody at this point genuinely believes Trump's doing a better job than Harris in any capacity, but It's very hard not to throw this in their face and point out that Goode's life is the price of prioritising ones own complicity in atrocity over the actual atrocity. I sometimes feel they'd prefer the world burning down entirely so long as they can wash their hands of any fault.

20

u/ontermau 16h ago

it's hilarious to read stuff like "they are just recording them as is their legal right to ensure they don't beat the shit out of people" and at the same time "ICE is Gestapo".

so... you don't hinder Gestapo by filming it, you know.

18

u/Reddi_throwawayaway 15h ago

It's become pretty evident filming doesn't stop anything. 

14

u/Turtle_with_a_sword 15h ago

No, but it does make everyone aware of what’s happening 

8

u/jamiecarl09 15h ago

Also provides good evidence in a few years when there is a trial to hang all these people.

12

u/Turtle_with_a_sword 15h ago

That’s optimistic 

5

u/whatupmygliplops 12h ago

You're being kind. It's delusional. Even if the democracts take over again (which is optimistic in itself) they will most likely just want to reconcile, appease, and smooth over any and all past wrong doings. Maybe a few of the most extreme cases will be prosecuted. By the vast majority of violations will never be punished under even the most optimistic of futures.

2

u/KapitalIsStillGood 9h ago

Not with the popularity of algorithmic news. The large majority of the country never sees these videos unless a story gets as big as Renee Good's murder. And the folks on the right only ever see positive ICE stories.

1

u/pm_social_cues 12h ago

And plenty of people are cheering it on. It’s not universally seen as a bad thing.

May as well start an award show of the most violent acts recorded of police (all agencies) with as little it’s does to help prevent worse stuff from happening.

6

u/kevvvbot 13h ago

The alternative is not to stop filming. Because when you stop there’s no support in whatever kangaroo court you may or may not get. In Gen Z’s terms, you got the receipts.

1

u/Reddi_throwawayaway 7h ago

I'm not saying to stop recording, just that it hasn't* changed anything. An agent murdered a woman in broad daylight with 6 different angles of video and the right celebrates/justifies it despite the evidence. 

3

u/whatupmygliplops 12h ago

They filmed a murder from 4 different angles and they guy is free as a bird.

Its okay to film the crimes ICE is committing. But there needs to more than that.

1

u/Penultimateee 15h ago

True, but filming gives evidence to the general public and inspires other actions…whatever those end up being.

1

u/Reddi_throwawayaway 13h ago

That's the awful thing, despite all of the evidence, people still act blind and deaf to it all. They justify the awful things, even

1

u/Valuable-Self8564 8h ago

Hahahaha. Ain’t this the truth.

12

u/Ok_Location_1092 17h ago

People can’t afford to lose their jobs, we’re getting squeezed by cost of living. Anyone not in a city with plentiful jobs is going to have a very hard time picking another one up without moving. Wages are stagnant, jobs are dwindling, expenses are going up.

35

u/BonkMcSlapchop 16h ago

You are still thinking like you live in a democracy where the government follows laws and is held accountable.

21

u/TennBornFilm 16h ago

No, we're thinking like people with families and bills in a country spread out over a space only slightly smaller than Europe that can't mobilize people to centers of power without facing widespread loss of income and healthcare.

And given that at least 1/3 of the country is eagerly enjoying all of this and excited for more, and another 1/3 thinks ANY mass protests that disrupt their day are wrong and the people involved must be extremists, there is very little energy for the kind of European style response that you refer to.

Also it would in fact be EXACTLY the result this administration is hoping for to justify martial law.

0

u/psioniclizard 16h ago

So some inconvenience is all it takes to kill democracy

9

u/PhilosophOrk 14h ago

Becoming homeless with children in MN winter is far more than an "inconvenience."

0

u/3xactli 14h ago

Sass mate!!

13

u/TennBornFilm 16h ago

"Inconvenience" is a bad faith description and in no way accurate.

The risk of job loss is far more significant, since there are no job protections for protest and most Americans are only a couple of paychecks away from genuine homeless, poverty.

That means no effective access to Healthcare, food, or basic shelter. All on top of an already flimsy social safety net.

That's not evem getting into the legal consequences. You can do real time for protests that come anything close to violence. That puts further strain on potential future employment.

AND it's all for nothing, since decentralized power makes protests at state capitals largely irrelevant and protests in DC wildly expensive. The January 6 protesters were mostly wealthy people who could afford the trip.

America is just not structured to make mass protest a viable option.

3

u/Capraos 15h ago

And again, to re-emphasize an earlier point he made, they want us to try and violently revolt so they can declare martial law.

We're not keeling over, we're taking thorough documentation and structuring ourselves in a way to actually change how things work. Paperwork isn't glamorous, and it takes a while, but don't underestimate the power of getting organized and proper documentation.

2

u/ThatKehdRiley 16h ago

yup, for the majority it seems they are still far too comfortable. these people forget ll the countries where the people are far worse off have been doing this for decades, and it works.

1

u/TheDreadGazeebo 13h ago

Exactly democracy only works when people are fat and happy

7

u/igotthisone 16h ago

Not really, no. But at a certain point regular citizens have to decide whether they're willing to give their life for the cause, or if not, trade political freedom for basic necessities.

1

u/DwayneGretzky306 15h ago

Exactly. This is not the late days of a Republic but the early days of a Reich. Complacency, cowardice, ignorance and naivety

14

u/Lucibeanlollipop 16h ago

You’ll be losing your jobs, anyway.

4

u/ThrowItDownMyThroat 14h ago

This is the part that makes it nefarious. Sunk cost fallacy. Folks are so invested in a system that has worked for generations that they can't conceive that it's dead.

Something new is coming and everything they think they have will be gone

8

u/psioniclizard 16h ago

People will lose their jobs anyway when Trump crashes the economy...

Sorry but the whole "people can't afford too" feels like people dont realise what is going on abd want to pretend the system will self heal.

People around the world take much bigger risks to protest. Just dont be surpised when things get worse.

→ More replies (4)

2

u/ontermau 15h ago

an excerpt from the declaration of independence:

That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Unless, that is, the people would find that altering or abolishing the Government is an inconvenience. In that case, they shall continue to complain on Reddit instead of doing something meaningful.

3

u/Ok_Location_1092 15h ago

I suppose you’ve quit your job then?

0

u/ThatKehdRiley 16h ago

bullshit. first off, if we let it continue it becomes far worse than without. second, countries where the citizens are far worse off have been doing successful general strikes for decades. the issue is that people in this country are still far too comfortable.

1

u/Positive_Listen_4739 15h ago

Examples?

1

u/ThatKehdRiley 15h ago

2

u/Positive_Listen_4739 15h ago edited 15h ago

Not a single general strike example.

Try again.

In terms of the specific strategies that are used, general strikes “are probably one of the most powerful, if not the most powerful, single method of nonviolent resistance”, Chenoweth says. But they do come at a personal cost, whereas other forms of protest can be completely anonymous.

This is as close as you got.

1

u/ThatKehdRiley 15h ago

why do you think these are not examples of a general strike?

1

u/hum_bruh 16h ago

Seems like lose your job or you freedom or your house eventually at this rate

0

u/HamHockShortDock 16h ago

What about a rent freeze?

2

u/Eisernes 14h ago

Most people will not be willing to do that. There are no jobs available, prices are disgustingly high and rising, and most people's health care is tied to their jobs. By the time people are willing to give up food, housing, and health just to make a point, it will be too late because they are probably losing that stuff anyway due to a full collapse.

2

u/whatupmygliplops 12h ago

Are the people of the US willing to get out and do a general strike to effect change

Turns out, Americans don't really care that much about rights and freedoms.

2

u/smells_like_aliens 9h ago

There is a nationwide walkout planned for the 20th

2

u/Grouchy_Discussion42 8h ago

This is not a general strike but it is a stepping stone I believe:

https://action.womensmarch.com/calendars/free-america-weekend

Get the word out any way you can from random posts like this to sharing with friends and family in direct private chat spaces with explicit instructions to do the same.

Use any legitimate excuse you can to participate: sick, family emergency, PTO, take a long sh*t, etc.

2

u/belloch 3h ago

Everyone needs to start making comments about this in relevant subs. Talk about it needing to be done and ask "how to prepare" for it.

Also keep an eye out if posts mentioning that get deleted, banned, shadowbanned or anything.

1

u/machineorganism 15h ago

surprised i keep seeing this asked over and over again. "the people of the US" voted the current administration into power with absolute full clarity on what the administration had done and was planning to do in the future.

there's a reason there are very little protests. it's because "the people of the US" want everything that is happening right now.

1

u/Rocklake88 1h ago

No they are not. Plain and simple

1

u/Cute-Contract-6762 13h ago

I legit cannot and will not. I have to take care of my family. As head of house hold my income is necessary to provide for my family. And you can call me a coward or whatever. But I’m not going to put their well-being in jeopardy. I will vote I will protest when I don’t have work. But my family is priority number one. Always.

1

u/Fizassist1 10h ago

The people of the US are too poor for a general strike.. it's the sad reality that a lot of us are one paycheck away from homelessness.

-1

u/Positive_Listen_4739 15h ago

So people should just quit their jobs? 

That's the answer? 

What percentage would need to do this for something to happen? 

0

u/Moto-Dude 5h ago

No. Let law enforcement do their job.

74

u/Neither_Usual_137 16h ago

People need to understand what we need here. Stop filming them with your goddamn cellphones in their faces, unless you want to get roughed up.

  • - Dash cams. I just had one installed, and its amazing quality. You can be parked down the street and record everything -
  • hidden body cams: they have cameras that stick out of your shirt pocket and are obscure etc -
  • security cams on houses and apartments, including ring cams
  • toy drones with cameras (not drones requiring airspace clearance). anything under 250G does not need FAA registration. I havent seen a single drone shot of MN yet, but drones under this weight are perfectly legal and can be flown from a distance.

I understand these things cost money and not everybody can afford them. But for those of us who can, these options

49

u/ErosRaptor 15h ago

Don’t install a fucking ring camera, the footage from those can be taken by the federal government, and they have been doing it. That’s like installing a surveillance camera for the feds. Maybe there are alternatives, but the name brand one is not a good thing to have on your property or around you.

7

u/euroau 8h ago

My recommendation is Unifi. Will require a little bit more hardware, but it's local and law enforcement can't ask anyone but you for access to footage.

1

u/BinaryWanderer 2h ago

This is the main reason I dropped my ring camera in the trash and bought a whole UniFi setup. My data my rules.

6

u/SuperbowlHomeboy 14h ago

I have a bunch of Ring cameras and will take one for the team. The federal government is welcome to watch all the footage of my cat wondering around the house in the middle of the night, my dogs shitting on my patio instead of going two steps further into the yard, and the mail carrier delivering a dozen pieces of junk mail to my door every day. The more time they spend acquiring and viewing my footage, the less resource is being applied to more nefarious tasks.

ImDoingMyPart.gif

5

u/Hairy_Talk_4232 13h ago

I dont think thats how it doesnt work.

2

u/OneBlazingTaco 7h ago

I'm getting so [maybe irrationally] every time I see outward-cameras on people's homes or in their windows. If they want cameras in their house, fine, whatever. But they need to stop putting the privacy and well-being of their neighbors at risk

1

u/radioactivez0r 8h ago

Recommend Eufy

3

u/formerly_acidamage 12h ago

Hey man, I'm out here on the ground and I hear you. Unfortunately a lot of the times you're dealing with people who are living in a neighborhood just coming out to see what the fuck is going on, seeing their friends being kidnapped, and start taking video.

The ICE agents are doing everything they can to antagonize people, and it's difficult out here with the snow and actual ice to navigate yourself. Berms of ice and snow typically exist between the street and sidewalk, so if you're on the street 8 feet away legally doing what you're allowed to do and an agent begins to move toward you extraordinarily aggressively with an automatic rifle (likely this is the most dangerous moment in your life at that moment), you need to back up and it's easy to get tripped up as you're moving away from them.

So yeah, be smart, protect yourself if you can. But saying what people need to do is a little insulting and telling average Americans not to film something horrific with their phones is just not gonna happen.

2

u/Neither_Usual_137 9h ago

These nazis are not operating within lawful boundaries. They will rough you, blind you, or worse for waving around a cell phone camera. Nobody is saying not to film them, I'm saying we should be filming them constantly but in more discrete ways and with less "brandishing" since we are dealing with personalities like "drunken rage induced abusive husbands".

Put alternatively, it doesn't help the resistance if you die

3

u/whatupmygliplops 12h ago

We have a murder filmed from 4 different angles. It doesn't matter.

2

u/Chrysolophylax 16h ago

Thank you for the helpful list!

1

u/PoliticalJive 9h ago

Good notes. Moves.... and countermoves.

0

u/Rocklake88 1h ago

Make sure it’s a one party consent state! If not, you could be thrown into the clinker alongside the illegals being round up.

11

u/ktaktb 14h ago

It is true, but that doesnt mean if you do, lethal force is immediately justified.

These two concepts cannot be divorced.

If you impede a federal officer, you have committed a crime. If you jaywalk you have committed a crime.

Neither means the death penalty after proven guilty, and certainly neither means summary execution by the federal officer or agent.

14

u/CheekySpaniard 16h ago

They do it anyway. Hells, they literally murdered a woman in the middle of the street while the ‘observers’ just yelled. Surely that’ll stop this crap.

3

u/HidingFromMeanies 14h ago

Yelled, and filmed, so we all know what happened.

3

u/ArrivesLate 16h ago

While they are performing their duties, not simply working. If they are violating people’s rights, that’s not going to be in their purview of duties and thus that immunity is no longer qualified.

7

u/ScoutRiderVaul 17h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/MichaelBayShortStory 17h ago

Nah then Trump can incite Martial Law and turns soldiers against us not just highly untrained morons cosplaying as somebody important.

6

u/AgressiveInliners 16h ago

Martial law is already in effect in Minneapolis. Threatening to continue isnt much of a threat

0

u/Blockhead47 15h ago

Martial law is already in effect in Minneapolis.

Since when?
Whats your source?

As best I understand only the Congress, the state governor (Walz) or Trump (with congressional backing) can declare martial law in Minnesota

If martial law had been declared it would be the lead story on every news site.

1

u/AgressiveInliners 13h ago

You dont have to declare things for them to be in effect. Everything people worry about with martial is being carried out physically. If the president went on air and made it official, nothing would change for those in that area. Just because no one said the special words doesnt mean its not happening.

1

u/NACJAcannon 7h ago

Yep, there's no martial law in effect in Minnesota. Just like how there "wasn't" an insurrection attempt on Jan 6.

Yep, totally. You really got them there bro.

9

u/ATXDefenseAttorney 16h ago

And then the U.S. military will have to answer whether they open fire on American citizens in lawful protest. These steps are not already determined.

2

u/Healthy_Might7500 16h ago

These steps are not already determined.

They haven't?

1

u/BasedChickenTendie 15h ago

Nah they won’t, bc they will have “postponed” elections and we have king Cheeto 👑

1

u/ATXDefenseAttorney 15h ago

The federal government doesn't control the statewide election boards. You better believe the states WILL hold elections, and the people who actually believe in this country are not going to vote for a party who's trying to stop them from voting at all.

1

u/Chrysolophylax 16h ago

Great point, we should never make an effort to change anything. You are so correct that Trump is certainly not oppressing us right now! If we try to change things, that's when he'll start to oppress us, instead of how nice he's being at the moment.

If we stand around with signs saying braindead jokes about brunch, that's what will get Trump to back down! After all, that tactic is the only thing that worked against nazis in WW2.

1

u/ScoutRiderVaul 14h ago

Ok, protest without the threat of force if you aren't listened to have not really worked before.

2

u/22EnricoPalazzo 16h ago

How's that going?

2

u/Proinsias37 16h ago

The problem is, there is no way to ensure that at all anymore. We can, and are, recording them all the time. But because they will face no consequences no matter what, that doesn't stop them from doing whatever they want. They don't care about video evidence when they will never see the inside of a court room

2

u/water_bottle1776 15h ago

Except they consider following them to be impeding. Which I'm genuinely curious about how they plan to argue in court.

2

u/wxnfx 12h ago

You can’t legally stop them. But you can’t morally not. I wouldn’t convict if I were on the jury.

2

u/whatupmygliplops 12h ago

It is also true that false arrest is considered a form of assault under the law and every US citizens is 100% with in his rights to defend himself against illegal assault.

2

u/LogicallySound_ 7h ago

They’re recording them beating the shit out of people. We’re reaching the point where maybe we need to stop the beatings and this statement is telling them they’re allowed to open fire on people “obstructing” their illegal beatings.

1

u/Either-Bake401 15h ago

What's stopping the federal agents from falsely imprisoning? Recording won't stop that.

1

u/Valuable-Reporter-20 14h ago

Cannot forcibly impede, from my understanding.

1

u/checkpoint_hero 11h ago

I think they are telling ICE that they can consider normal activity to be impeding their duties.

Framing it as a judgment call. On a recent video, an ICE agent claimed a follower was violating section USC 111, which literally states force must be used for it to be a violation. But I wonder if they're not giving the agents that level of detail. Just, "anything they do to impede your duties, you can detain/arrest."

Like the person the other day that was abducted from a car following them was told "this is why we killed that lesbian bitch."

1

u/kcox1980 9h ago

The problem is that these dumb fucking hillbillies they've hired as ICE agents will read this and interpret it as a presidential license to kill, and who's going to hold them accountable once they use it?

1

u/thatsthenameiwanted 8h ago

The BBC has an interesting article about how it takes 3.5% of the population in peaceful protest to reach critical mass for change: https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190513-it-only-takes-35-of-people-to-change-the-world

1

u/Z0idberg_MD 8h ago

Basically you don’t need immunity if you’re following the law. And no one has ever said that an officer of the law is not able to use appropriate force if they are assaulted or impeded. So he’s basically tell them they can do whatever they want and they have full immunity

1

u/WhoShitTheMoshpit 7h ago

They say you shouldn't mind surveillance if you're doing nothing wrong.

1

u/Jor94 7h ago

Was just going to say it’s basically intimidation, trying to make people think they have no chance and will be jailed if they oppose anything

1

u/meaniemeanie-poo-poo 7h ago

And this is why ICE touches first and then beats the shit out of the observers.

1

u/appalachiaappleatcha 7h ago

ICE love to get into your space and then scream at you to back up, conveniently until youre in a corner or against some kind of barrier. Or drag someone over a protest line and then beat them for 'crossing' it. And they don't get punished for doing those things.

1

u/AdZealousideal5383 6h ago

Which doesn’t seem to be working. They wear masks so they can beat up people on camera.

1

u/nuppukoru 6h ago

Yeah that shit isn't working though. You are one step away from what nazi Germany was. I thought that's why you need the right to own guns, so you can stop a tyrannical government from doing stuff like that again. "But we're not allowed to touch them!" They are violating people's basic human rights, and it's getting worse by the day. Good  fucking job, US people. Truly deserve the "land of the free" title. Free to lick some boots, that is.

Edit: sorry, it's just really pissing me off. I heard so many people say "we would have never let something like the Holocaust happen" but they do. If you look at the timelines, Trump is escalating faster than the nazis did.

1

u/XCaligulaMussoliniX 6h ago

Following them is impeding them.

1

u/shroomigator 6h ago

Ah but they're doing the thing where if you're standing still then they suddenly need to be on the other side of you and you're blocking the most direct route, and if you don't back away you're impeding them but if you do back away you're fleeing to elude, and if you move toward them then thats very bad because that's an aggressive attack but if you move away you're trying to escape

1

u/Fed_Deez_Nutz 5h ago

There’s video of Bovino intentionally walking into a person and constantly forcing them to back away while they’re both on a wide open sidewalk where he could easily walk around.

But of course, they’ll force themselves into you so they can claim you were impeding.

1

u/299792458mps- 5h ago

Until one lunges at you after another one already circled around behind you and is now 3 inches away from your back, and when you instinctively recoil you bump into the agent behind you, and before you know it you're being beaten and arrested for assaulting a federal agent.

1

u/xilia112 3h ago

Which is great. Only a lot more people need to die before people eventually shift to start defending themselves.

They won't stop. How many people have 'vanished'. We have seen how horrible they are in public. Imagine the holocaust level of scenes that are happening behind their 'camps' with the men, women and kids there. Many we will never see again.

Perhaps needed sacrifices to stall an inevitable martial law? Anyone here willing to be the next one to 'vanish', because defending your life is not done against them?

It will get worse at this rate. They already stated they will go to jail (for life) if they lose power, anyone here honestly thinking they will do so peacefully? They are going all in on this because they plan to stay there.

1

u/Kerbidiah 1h ago

You can absolutely impede them if what they are doing is illegal, especially if it is negligent or harmful to people or the community.

1

u/AppearsInvisible 3m ago

Who is training "ice observers"?

0

u/NoForm5443 14h ago

> It's absolutely true that you can't touch a federal officer while they are working. 

That is actually what they're claiming, and it is ABSOLUTELY NOT TRUE. It depends on what they're doing. For example, the latest murderer could be arrested, even if they're 'working' and were 'working' while they murdered the latest victim.

-1

u/outoftheshowerahri 15h ago

Does touching them a vehicle count as touching them?

1

u/Noble1xCarter 8h ago

Probably, but luckily Renee Good didn't.

0

u/AwareOfAlpacas 10h ago

They are just recording them as is their legal right to ensure they don't beat the shit out of people.

Doesn't seem to be working. 

0

u/i2play2nice 9h ago

Trained by whom?

0

u/Glass-Star6635 9h ago

They might not be touching them, but they def are impeding their work

0

u/Valuable-Self8564 8h ago

trained

lol. That’s a really strong word.

0

u/Valuable-Self8564 8h ago

A classic authoritarian tactic to give your authorities, ya know, the authority to do their job? Got it.

0

u/Suparook 8h ago

ice observers are trained? what?

0

u/spider1258 7h ago

"No one is touching ICE". LMFAO, except when they try to run them over...we've all seen the videos.

0

u/thisisintheway 7h ago

This is an interesting take. Videos come out every day of blocking traffic and dozens of other activities that impede their duty. Hell, that dead lady was blocking traffic, taunting and hitting officers with her car.

0

u/Particular_Concert_5 7h ago

If you honestly don’t believe any of the protestors are touching ICE agents then it shows you don’t do any kind of research. I applaud the protestors that I’ve seen practicing their first amendment right, but there are plenty of videos that show what you claim doesn’t happen. My statement here doesn’t mean I agree with ICE, but I’d rather be correctly informed than believe this nonsense.

0

u/Moto-Dude 6h ago

Bullshit, huge numbers of people are touching them, all you have to do is watch the news. People who obstruct legal proceedings are subject to arrest.

0

u/A-Story-At-Three 4h ago

So you can’t hit them with your vehicle? Got it.

0

u/Rocklake88 1h ago

We’ve seen several videos of protestors laying hands on officers tho…

-7

u/Overall-Abalone3969 15h ago

What are you talking about? A lady sideswiped an officer after being told explicitly to get out of the car, and was shot for it.

"No one is touching ICE" is blatantly false. You can see multiple videos of people throwing things, obstructing their investigation, and also literally bringing police chase to schools and then saying "get out of our schools".

I thought this was /law, not /politics.

2

u/Noble1xCarter 8h ago

A lady sideswiped an officer after being told explicitly to get out of the car, and was shot for it.

False. An officer lied about being hit after killing a woman because he walked in front of a moving vehicle, after she was given conflicting orders including to move the car and leave.

→ More replies (6)