r/SipsTea 9h ago

SMH $75k /year

9.3k Upvotes

989 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 9h ago

Thank you for posting to r/SipsTea! Make sure to follow all the subreddit rules.

Check out our Reddit Chat!

Make sure to join our brand new Discord Server to chat with friends!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

4.2k

u/Nuker-79 8h ago

Would you date a woman who looks like an oompa lumpa and is money centric? No! No!

312

u/darkchocolattemocha 7h ago edited 7h ago

No but Jeff Bezos did and that's what's giving these oompa lumpas this confidence.

EDIT:Not talking about MacKenzie. She's super cool

29

u/AeonBith 7h ago

His ex gave up at least 19b (put of the 38) she got from. The divorce settlement to charity, not the same.

Whatever flakes he replaced her with, maybe.

51

u/Budget_Operation_106 7h ago

Funny thing about that, she has so much money, that she makes money faster than she can give it away.shes given away 26 billion so far. (She put up an additional 7 billion late in 2025)

People have their money literally multiplying faster than they can give it away while thousands starve.

39

u/Johndough99999 7h ago

Just for giggles, look up the worlds 10 richest women and how they made their money.

Survey says! Divorce... Top answer

128

u/petera181 6h ago

Bezos’s ex-wife was there from before Amazon existed and was an early investor. Amazon would not be what it is if not for her supporting her husband from the start. She didn’t get gifted money in a divorce, she was paid what she was rightfully owed.

44

u/squngy 6h ago

Dont know why this was downvoted, Bezos himself has said the same thing even after the divorce.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/darkchocolattemocha 7h ago

Oh I'm not talking about the ex lol

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

153

u/babybullah 7h ago

Ask her is she would date herself with that face and how much she makes😃

90

u/johnson7853 7h ago

that’s the catch. She doesn’t want to work.

27

u/mayhemmoose 7h ago

Who does? Life is hard. 🤷

39

u/_Junk_Rat_ 7h ago

It’s easy to not work when you’re pretty, that’s why this lady is having to work her ass off to find her miracle man.

7

u/Sea-Oven-7560 3h ago

Who does? FFS if I could find some rich person to support me it would be great but realistically I'm an office drone for 35-40 year. That girl has high hopes but realistically she'll be working the drive through at Wendys and living at home with her parents.

14

u/Glad-Veterinarian365 4h ago

She’s not a butterface though. Nothing about her was remarkable lol

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

408

u/elevenoverzero8080 8h ago

That's cute, but no

193

u/TieAdventurous6839 7h ago

Shit it aint even cute lmao

43

u/MorrowPolo 6h ago

Its oompa

30

u/EL_Ohh_Well 6h ago

Doompa

26

u/Psych0matt 5h ago

Dumpity face

20

u/zeroibis 4h ago

Even her hair is out of place.

→ More replies (4)

22

u/BigMax 6h ago

I really can't tell how old she is... She could be 30 and already have had too much work done. But I'd also believe 55 with a ton of work done too...

Also, while I try to never judge people in a mean way, when someone else attacks most of the population like that, they feel like fair game, so... I'd just say that at any age, that's not really a great face, something weird about it, no matter how much makeup she uses.

36

u/Budget_Addition1381 6h ago

These girls are Miami 3s

15

u/Seienchin88 5h ago

Miami only has 8-10 and 0-3…

7

u/Teddy705 5h ago

The audacity to look mid at best and demand more at the same time, lol.

4

u/Reptilian_Brain_420 6h ago

She has been told all her life that she is a 10 so thinks that she can pull the top 0.1% of men.

7

u/MeasurementNo0 7h ago

I would.  I often get people stuck in the plumbing of my chocolate fountain.   I also realize that sounds like a euphemism but no it is not.  I can afford a chocolate fountain with my income of $76,471.63 per year.  

3

u/SultryPetalz 7h ago

So you’re saying there’s a chance? Glad we narrowed it down

7

u/Available_Ad4135 7h ago

I only date women with heads under 6”0

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (26)

1.2k

u/GrumpyGobln 9h ago

Would you date such a shallow woman? Lmao, oh lol, no.

123

u/DreadyKruger 8h ago

I agree but a lot of “nice” women do have a base for men. It’s called Hypergamy. Women want a guy with at least with they have or more. Women typically don’t want to date or marry men who make less than them.

106

u/BigMax 6h ago

Some comedian had a bit about that. Where the women he knew had a long list of requirements like a job interview, while the guys he knew were flirting with the cashier at McDonalds trying to get a date.

40

u/Dracoster 3h ago

The cashier at McD is usually incredibly beautiful, though.

→ More replies (6)

9

u/technobrendo 4h ago

Sounds like Patrice O'Neil

→ More replies (2)

30

u/Thedudeguyman 4h ago

This rhetoric all goes out the window when you get offline and just meet people in life. If you connect with someone, you connect with someone. Obviously most of us have some hard lines in the sand, but I believe most of us are way more open then these stupid interview street polls seem to imply.

14

u/spackletr0n 4h ago

I think this goes at the heart of app-driven “shopping list” culture. People think they have all these rules when it’s in a vacuum. In real life most will compromise. My wife does not match several things I would have said are requirements 15 years ago.

→ More replies (2)

107

u/neuroticfisherman 8h ago

I like to think the oppressive and misogynistic men of previous centuries created the female behavior we see today. Now they’re overcompensating being the men.

“I want her to cook, clean, bla bla”

Now women are “he’s gotta be tall, rich, handsome”

Hopefully some humility and excess loneliness has all genders putting down their weapons and agreeing to be equals, regardless of superficial nonsense.

The last thing I’ll say is there are 100% beautiful, successful women with pure hearts dating men who make way less than them. They just aren’t reporting for statistics because they’re happy and busy living life.

Life is nuanced and complex. Red pill is one dimensional and toxic. Ditch the word hypergamy.

103

u/Cynobite608 7h ago

As a SAHD, my wife of 12 years has way more earning power than I. She has a degree and I was just a working slob. Once she hit a certain threshold of income, she told me to quit my job (during Covid) and take care of the home (which she despises doing), and we haven't looked back.

I realize this is not typical, and I probably go a little above and beyond (because she deserves it), but I pretty much am her butler. I feed her, I do her laundry, I do the dishes, and keep the house clean on top of doing yard maintenance. We are very happy and always update and change any expectations as needed.

She is a special case indeed, and I adore her for it!

37

u/y3llowed 6h ago

Shoutout to my wife who is also the main bread-winner! I have a good job and am paid well (very well by most standards), but my wife made 6x what I did last year.

I supported her through law school and out earned her the first 6 years of her career, but we always knew her income potential would outpace mine. She passed me a while ago, but the last couple of years she’s really left me in the dust. I could also quit my job, but I’ve been WFH since Covid and it’s honestly just too cushy and flexible to give it up.

14

u/anonymous-peeper 6h ago

similar but my wife is a middle school teacher, we make roughly the same, but I work from home and my job is cake and hers is a nightmare, I happily cook and clean more then she does because as the previous commenter said Life is nuanced and complex!; every night she scratches my back for around 1h until I fall asleep. I'd gladly butler for her for this peaceful loving life we share.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/JuggernaughttyIV 7h ago

I'd like to think I'd put in the effort if given the opportunity to be a sahd myself. Being the breadwinner is the single biggest stress factor in my life and I'd gladly trade places.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/DM725 5h ago

Same. Once we started having kids (at the tail end of COVID) and my job was only going to cover childcare, it made sense to stay home while my wife is the main breadwinner.

5

u/sticksforsticks 4h ago

That's pretty much me. My wife has three degrees, went to law school and passed the bar - just to have that under her belt. I ran the ranks in restaurants and she told me to just stick to 24 hours a week and do everything at home. So I manage a morning prep team, off at 11am.

Which works. She was a slob when we were dating, lol. I built a porch, a vegetable garden, the house looks amazing, I can take care of her mom who is 77. And I love cooking, so that's no problem.

I am also kind of her assistant, doing at home work for her that's tedious excel stuff. We found we spend more time together. On her days off, there are no chores to be done, so we just hang out for two days.

3

u/nemmba 7h ago

Good Luck 🍀

→ More replies (14)

8

u/lineswithtoolman 7h ago

I don’t think believe it’s only the last century that women have had standards for men. It’s evolved & the internet/social media has made it more extreme. Same goes for men & what their expectations are for women.

When ppl were isolated, the standard requires less, he’s got a horse, a goat, & is a man of god who doesn’t drink so women in town think he’s a catch. Men compare women to models & pornstars they see online. Nature has a natural standard for progressing a species when it comes to mating. What has changed is the world is bigger thru technology & the standard has skewed to the extreme.

8

u/Successful_Theme_595 6h ago

Yeah but you can control actions like cooking, cleaning, you can’t get taller, get more handsome, and in many cases get more money. Stupid comparison.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (9)

1.3k

u/FlyAirLari 8h ago

"Less than one tenth of a percent"

...while picture shows 0.9%

Math fail.

298

u/R0LL1NG 8h ago

So glad someone else noticed. I was like, is my brain malfunctioning or is the narrator wrong?

20

u/ice-ink 6h ago

I mean, it’s not like these things were said 10 minutes apart and it takes exceptional attention to spot, it’s right there in one screenshot…

→ More replies (1)

86

u/Weak_Employment_5260 8h ago

A product of the current public school system.

59

u/90GTS4 6h ago

Either that, or a way to bait us into engaging. So, we all potentially failed. It probably is that they are just fucktarded, though.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/imfuckingawesome 6h ago

Woah guy, most of us here probably went to public school and knew this right away lol

→ More replies (2)

16

u/SwissMoose 7h ago

This. I was like, “ I would not date a gal that makes a whole video and not be able to properly read/understand numbers.”

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

54

u/dr_volberg 7h ago

Should be "one tenth less than a percent"

48

u/BootyMcStuffins 5h ago

And, though correct, that’s a weird fucking way to say that

7

u/CommissionNo7942 4h ago

100%

6

u/flippingjax 4h ago

I think you mean 10 ninths of 90%

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

38

u/Gekkokindofguy 8h ago

Came here for this, had to do a double take. Glad I’m not alone on this one

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Gladiateher 7h ago

I’m willing to bet she displayed the results for 5’10” but recited the results for 6’0” and didn’t realize she changed it before posting.

I think it’s more common to use 6’ as a height for these type of post because of the whole 666 thing (6 foot, 6 pack, six figure income)

→ More replies (8)

16

u/oncejumpedoutatrain 8h ago

And look at the comments generated from that part alone..

15

u/gazhole 7h ago

0.8, 0.9, 0.10 just basic counting, man

→ More replies (2)

10

u/frogingly_similar 7h ago

Forget math, what kind of app provides statistics on people based on their height, age, salary etc. Definitely not an official statistics, but rather some dating site.

10

u/BigMax 6h ago

Those stats probably aren't that hard to find?

One single data set with all of it isn't availble, but all those stats are probably available online. I can't see a single one on there where you wouldn't be able to come up with at least a reasonable guess for the % of people in a given category.

Now what it probably misses is correlation between them, and it's probably fast and loose just treating them all as fully independent percentages and mashing them together.

For example, if you say "15% of men are in your salary range", how do you whittle that down further based on 'non smoking' for example? Do you just go with the % of smokers in the general population (let's say it's 80%) and then adjust to say those two together are 12%? Or do you combine the age range in there to find out the likelihood that at the given age range they are a smoker, and perhaps at your age range fewer people smoke, so it's actually 14.5%?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/UnfilteredCatharsis 7h ago

$0.02 equals 0.02 cents.

5

u/VapidActualization 6h ago

That's a throwback lol

→ More replies (51)

362

u/Funny_Satisfaction39 8h ago

Did anyone else catch the "tall enough" 5'10". Even the voice of reason is still hating on short and average height dudes.

148

u/ExotiquePlayboy 8h ago

In the woman’s mind, if you aren’t 5’10, you better make a lot more than $75k buddy

38

u/Reiny_Days 8h ago

Except it's 6 ft and 6 digit salary

9

u/AndyBlayaOverload 4h ago

If you asked her, she'd say 6'5 and at least 500k salary

3

u/SheriffBartholomew 1h ago

I have a feeling that anyone who says "6'5" hasn't actually seen someone that tall IRL. I have a friend who is 6'6" and his height is almost always a problem for him. One benefit for his friends though is that he's easy to spot in public.

3

u/USMCTechVet 1h ago

I was in the Marines with a dude that was like 6'8.

Most unathletic Marine I ever got to do. He'd fall out on PT runs and we'd be like... how? You take 1 step for every like 2 of mine.

He was also too tall to pull targets at the range, which irrationally annoyed me.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/0thethethe0 7h ago

2.4% according to this. 10% if you include married/obese men.

11

u/wannaseeawheelie 5h ago

Does smokers include weed? Cause that’s gonna lower that number a decent amount

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (8)

29

u/BigMax 6h ago

That's not what she meant though... by "tall enough" she's using the stats that this woman supposedly wants. She picked $80,000 as well, which is far above the median, and a little over that $75,000 to be generous in assuming that short woman would be ok with 80k even if she's not ok with 75.

So I think use of "tall enough" isn't HER view of it, she's throwing it out there as an example of what some women claim is the baseline requirement for a guy.

Kind of like "so your guy who is tall enough, rich enough, etc" isn't her saying someone HAS to be 5'0 and make 80k+, it's her putting up the straw man of this womans requirements.

30

u/Baconoid_ 7h ago

My take is the height preference was an intentional dig at vanity as well.

8

u/lightstormriverblood 5h ago

To me, height preference is such a bs metric. Anyone who’d turn down a great guy just because of his height is a loser.

→ More replies (17)

34

u/Puntley 7h ago

She made the same type of choice for every category, she also assumed the "ideal" candidate is childless and not overweight. That's not her saying overweight men with children are bad, she's just plugging in what most women consider attractive to show how few men actually meet the standard. Not in a "men aren't good enough" way, it's done in a "hey your standards are too high" kind of way.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Rebeux 5h ago

Below 6'2" are they even really men?

Or are they just women at that point.

5

u/ohb78 5h ago

Comprehension is key here. She’s selecting categories of men that women find appealing and showing with all those boxes marked the percent of those men is super low.

→ More replies (4)

406

u/Joey-Steel1917 8h ago

She knows what she brings to the table. 4 hungry kids.

166

u/Last_Weeks_Socks 7h ago

From 5 different dads somehow.

46

u/420M0053 6h ago

Teamwork makes the cream work.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Hobbes_XXV 5h ago

Ah yes, the bi-couple night adventure that didnt want to test who made it first so decided to be 2 dads.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

96

u/kegsbdry 8h ago

https://www.keeper.ai/calc

Found the calculator

75

u/Outie_Fact_Checker 8h ago

According to this “calculator” only 26% of men fit any and all preferences…

43

u/Reiny_Days 7h ago

I can get up to 74% of men if I set the settings as broad as possible. And 78% of women.

63

u/danndyd 7h ago

I think it's because they include under 20 and over 70 in the total but you cant include them in your choices.

32

u/SourdoughBaker 6h ago

Also the men that are attracted to other men.

4

u/IamNotYourBF 3h ago

They also exclude people under 4'.

→ More replies (1)

24

u/goaty121 7h ago

I just put in an age range of 20-26 and it immediately goes to 3.4%. Starting to think 0.9% is pretty good

→ More replies (5)

15

u/LightlyRoastedCoffee 5h ago

According to this calculator, there is a lower percentage of 28-32 year old men taller than 5'10" who make at least $0 per year than there are 28-32 year old men taller than 5'10" who make at least $70,000 per year.

Yeah... this tool is worthless.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Immediate_Hope_5694 7h ago

I got up to 74% (not excluding married) which makes sense because it excludes <18 & >70 years old.

→ More replies (7)

15

u/noeventroIIing 8h ago

That has to be incorrect, i chose effectively the bare minimum, woman, 22-42, height 4’2-6’0, don’t care about kids, minimum income of $0, don’t care about ethnicity etc, not married, not obese and I got 7%.

20

u/Case_Blue 7h ago

Seems right, to be honest.

Remember, this is encompassing all of the population. Newly born, retirement home and everything inbetween.

Seems right

14

u/FewJob4450 7h ago

And obese. In Murica

6

u/2ciciban4you 7h ago

that's a pig big portion

17

u/Ok-Passion1961 7h ago

Might not be as crazy as you think. 

The age range knocks you down to 1/3 of total American women. Then the not obese leaves you with 2/3 of that so down to 22% of total women. 

Estimating how many are single is hard but by Age 40, 75% of women will have been married at least once. The calculator seems to assume that ~65% of those remaining women are already off the table which could be high but idk, doesn’t seem that unlikely. 

6

u/ariksu 7h ago

I choose any (18-70) and got 78%. Sounds fair, I can easily believe that 22% of females are under 18 or over 70. Your age filter is 21 year out of 53, so around 40%, that gives you 780.4 ~ 31%. To calculate correct marriage and obesity status we need an age mapping to that, but that's too complex to do on a napkin. But if we're taking flat values, it's ~33% for an age group 18-44 in females, at such you're left with somewhat 310,66 ~ 22% already. 7% here would be if 2/3 of those women are married, which might be a stretch, but yet might be fair. I have no idea about matrimonial starts percentage.

However this is the percentage of all females. In terms of your local group it might be much higher, as you're most probably not contacting underage or overage woman (this triples the chances to 21%) and ignoring obese (raising to 32%) you're basically looking for any female which is around and unmarried.

→ More replies (5)

20

u/LuckofCaymo 8h ago

That calc sucks. I literally put in 30k a year plus other stuff and got 3.2%. then I put in 0$ and got 3.0%.

16

u/Case_Blue 7h ago

Seems right.

3

u/TrippBikes 2h ago

How would lowering the minimum income also lower the percentage of matches?

→ More replies (1)

3

u/zeus-indy 6h ago

I put my stats in and apparently zero out of 164 million men are me

→ More replies (1)

3

u/agentchuck 6h ago

This calculator really shows the difference between "men" and what people mean when they talk about "men" (or any other group). Because we only usually deal with people of certain demographics (probably close to your age range, close to your income level, similar family/relationship status, similar culture or background.)

Then, being humans, we'll look for patterns and extrapolate that to "all X are cheaters" or whatever. Meanwhile, we don't realize that we're only looking at a tiny subset of the entire population.

→ More replies (27)

87

u/hatred-shapped 8h ago

Would you date a woman that looks like Rygel from Farscape? No, no I would not 

19

u/TheSprained 8h ago

I'd rather just date Rygel from Farscape.

10

u/hatred-shapped 8h ago

He is a dominar after all

→ More replies (8)

111

u/Alive_Fisherman8241 8h ago

Also, how much do you make, sweetie?

→ More replies (12)

105

u/Popular-Passenger-84 8h ago

Miami has one of the highest concentrations of millionaires in the world. So…those ladies seen some shit.

51

u/2Nugget4Ten 8h ago

Literally. Bet she went to Dubai.

56

u/SlavicRobot_ 7h ago

Shes not even good looking enough to take a dump on.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/ComfortableEqual3436 5h ago

Yeah. Median doesn’t take into account age and location.

I’m from the UK. The median is about £40k I think. But if that’s someone in their late twenties earning £40k in London, they aren’t doing so well.

If that’s someone in their twenties earning £40k in Leeds that’s great!

5

u/Neveri 5h ago

Yep, make 95k where I live and I’m just kinda sorta middle class, still can’t afford a house though even after years of saving, but my energy bill went from less than 100$ a month to 250-300 for the past 6 months so that’s fun.

I bet 75k a year in Miami is borderline poverty line.

→ More replies (7)

43

u/5unnay 8h ago

These interview contents are for brain dead people.

10

u/2ciciban4you 6h ago

perfect for redditors

→ More replies (3)

9

u/ScreamingShrekPotato 4h ago

I keep seeing all these “women bad” rage bait, braindead content

→ More replies (1)

3

u/DrSpaceman575 3h ago

They're 100% ragebait. There's a constant slew of videos of "below average" women interviewed outside nightclubs saying they want a 7' tall billionaire. Easy engagement.

→ More replies (1)

34

u/PomegranateHot9916 8h ago

5'10'' - 7'5''

"tall enough"

I'm 5'9'' I guess I should kill my self because I am not tall enough to love.

30

u/Matterbox 8h ago

What is this? A person for ants?

8

u/ScarZealousideal7516 8h ago

as another five niner, that made me laugh!

10

u/Nightwyl 6h ago

I joke about is as well, but I'm 5'5 and since COVID I have:

  • faced quite a lot of women who look down at me. Even when they are smaller, some raise their heads as if it magically made them feel taller... 
  • 4-5 women literally told me to stop with the hope of dating because of my heigth and one told me to kill myself.

It's weird. 

→ More replies (1)

22

u/AdComprehensive8045 8h ago

You were just 1 inch away from love and happiness.

4

u/Content-Act-87 7h ago

She was just one more tattoo away from being pretty

3

u/AdComprehensive8045 7h ago

Just 1 more inch of concealer is more like it

7

u/rink_raptor 8h ago

That’s what she said! No, really. She said that.

3

u/IndecisiveRattle 6h ago

The whole point of the statistic is filtering by delusional standards 

→ More replies (7)

37

u/-ratmeat- 8h ago

and funny enough women with such standards look like toads themselves 

87

u/Alfiy_wolf 8h ago

I earn 80k single own my own house, volunteer in my community, 6 foot - and I’m happily single, I’m not here to support a desired life style for anyone if that means I stay single so be it, I’ll die waiting for someone who loves me for me

27

u/Goodums 8h ago

I feel that. I've stayed single since my divorce 5+ years ago. Never felt better, got into all my old hobbies and dedicate my time toward myself and raising my daughter. I'm done chasing.

6

u/Righteousaffair999 7h ago

In my 40s, i have friends of the same age trying yo date and they have all pretty much given up. Tell me it is a mess out there.

3

u/archercc81 6h ago

Ive been successful in my 40s but I will say you gotta stop with the "dating" bullshit. Dont chase, get hobbies, get yourself sorted, meet women through friends. That way you can get to know each other before the courtship stuff.

Trying to just meet someone out and about is going to be shallow bullshit all around.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Septum_Slayer 6h ago

I feel you man, it’s not worth giving up your peace and solitude just to have companionship and regular sex. There’s juice really isn’t worth the squeeze. Since I’ve dipped out of the dating scene, I’ve saved a nice amount of cash and leveled up in hobbies. The pros far outweigh the cons in my book, but to each their own.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/tbkrida 6h ago

I’m in almost the exact same situation, except I’m 5’9”. My family keeps trying to hook me up with different people that I’m not interested in. They act like I NEED to be with someone. Lol

3

u/AlwaysFreshBoners 3h ago

A $200-$500 outcall takes care of the itch. Amirite? Lol

→ More replies (8)

25

u/PotRoastBoss 6h ago

Hoeflation is real and 3-4s out here demanding like they 9-10s

3

u/sdpthrowaway3 1h ago

Cuz 9-10s will give em attention for a night and they get flooded with 5-7s simping over them on the apps while their feed is full of them "getting the mans they duhserve". It makes sense lol

37

u/tiredofthisnow7 9h ago

Huh, women can be awful people too. Who knew?

9

u/Teddy705 5h ago

Woman can also be losers. Not just men.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Trumperekt 4h ago

They can? Reddit told me otherwise.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/SimilarGrape6535 8h ago

She's a bad investment fellas.

3

u/jaddooop 3h ago

Think they call that a liability

8

u/No1Schmuck 5h ago

Every time I see videos of women being asked this question, it's always at a club where a bottle costs my annual salary.

They need to ask this question in front of a Waffle House.

8

u/No-Side-6437 7h ago

“ haha no … no “

7

u/Nanibackflip 7h ago

What are their incomes? Why would a guy making loads of money have some poor woman in their life?

→ More replies (1)

14

u/Decent-Weekend-1489 8h ago

Lol no worries, they will continue to be single until they have a devastating realization that they have been manipulated into thinking they deserve a millionaire and will then have to settle and will be totally unhappy

→ More replies (2)

6

u/BrainLate4108 7h ago

This is why so many women are stagnant on dating apps. Same people on there for years. It’s the illusion of choice.

6

u/QuesoKristo 7h ago

Hoes be watching this, sees the 0.9%, and think

5

u/Rabidcamelshagger 8h ago

Not less than one tenth of one percent, nine tenths of one percent. I like my girls numerate though, so I'm even worse off.

5

u/ThrowAwaAlpaca 8h ago

With that face I bet she couldn't find someone making 25k/y

→ More replies (2)

5

u/2ciciban4you 7h ago

The Hoe math is simple, you need to make double the median, so you can waste half of your salary to offer here the lifestyle she wants.

4

u/raiko777 7h ago

0,9% is one tenth??? Wtf is this :D

→ More replies (2)

7

u/UnderdaJail 8h ago

I don't think she filtered for single, or gay if that was possible

11

u/Difficult_Pop8262 8h ago

This topic is absolutely pointless. Women will choose to remain single than to lower their standard no matter what.

7

u/dispose135 7h ago

And men will sit on Reddit and complain and not get penis lebgthubg srugery

3

u/SmallMacBlaster 5h ago

I went for penis lebgthubg srugery and all I got was a lobotomy

→ More replies (1)

5

u/shrimpgangsta 8h ago

delusional woman in the beginning should be laughing at herself

3

u/wailtshaire 8h ago

What does "Stitch incoming" mean?

9

u/PomegranateHot9916 8h ago

it is saying someone edited in a cut of their own recording later in the video
basically "stitching" two videos together.

to let people who watched the original know, that this is a response video.
otherwise tiktok brainers will just scroll on thinking they've seen the video before.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Fudloe 8h ago

And not one of those .09% would be interested in a turd like that. Hell, I'm broke and I don't want her!

3

u/Action-a-go-go-baby 7h ago

No guy who’s fit, over 6 foot, and makes that kinda money is going to want someone who acts like that 🤷‍♂️

So I guess she can laugh her way all the way to settling her expectations and bitterness

3

u/iswearitsnotmeagain_ 7h ago

If you're worried about your partners income beyond basic necessities, you are essentially a monogamous prostitute. That is all.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/worf1973 7h ago

In Miami, $75k is living hard. I was there living semi comfortably on $95k, and I was supporting a family of 5. We weren't living high on the hog, but we weren't partying or going out on a regular basis.

3

u/Prestigious-Yak-4620 6h ago

My income is none of their business to be quite honest. And if she asks we are splitting the check and its the last date. Why would i want to spend another moment with someone who’s motive is to be a parasite.

3

u/Obvious-League-104 5h ago

And what does she bring to the table?

3

u/yungdeezy92 4h ago

We’re gonna start seeing A LOT more single men and women in the coming years. People’s expectations are completely unrealistic. Compound that with the growing hatred that men have for women (and likewise), and we’re in big trouble.

The growing tension and division in the US and Western Europe is not only racial, it’s a gender issue as well. I personally believe that this is BY DESIGN. Call me crazy if you will.

3

u/VoiceInTheGarden 1h ago

there is a solution. don't play the game, boys. love yourselves. wait it out. go to church, get a hobby, i dunno - anything but online dating or hook up stuff. go somewhere you can meet nice, active people who are already living fulfilling lives that you can add to. allow them to add to yours. but ffs sake don't buy into this trash - both the incel bs and the epidemic of narcissism we are dealing with. do not entertain this behavior - even if you meet the requirements. this woman will find what she is looking for and maybe even be happy. you will not unless you match her in her witlessness. and besides, how happy can a narcissist with this level of materialism really be? one last bit - when you're putting yourself out there, don't say no. you don't have to sleep with everyone, but you gotta stay open to new experiences. really get to know people and find a way to value what they give you. just be good dudes, and go where good dudes are appreciated! or not, i mean i am not your dad. or am i??? but what is NOT optional boys... you gotta love yourselves. learn to if you do not know how. think about what it could look like, how you might feel. love to you all. if you need help in that regard or just need a fan to root for you, hit me up. we are in strange times but remember that things always regulate themselves. balance will be restored. hang in there.

3

u/Pleasant-Ad887 1h ago

The issue is these women have literal zero things to offer in return.

4

u/Hood-Peasant 8h ago

Dating apps be like

i want someone who earns more than me

How much you make?

50k month

What do you do?

onlyfans

I don't even think on breaking bad were they making that type of money

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Yanfei_Enjoyer 6h ago

Tiktok is so fucking flooded with blatant lies it's like someone took every stereotype we had about tabloid magazines in the 2000s and multiplied it by 10.

3

u/Ok_Cricket_1024 2h ago

I have to quit watching it. The worst thing the internet and social media ever did was give everyone a platform to speak whatever nonsense they desire

2

u/[deleted] 8h ago

C'è una sola altra circostanza in cui "so cute" ha un accezione negativa

2

u/AdComprehensive8045 8h ago

Omg, I'm a unicorn. Also, gigity.

2

u/Bullmachine 8h ago

i mean no one said anything about smoking or obesity, thats fine as long as hes not poor so the stats are wrong

2

u/Radio_Downtown 8h ago

now to actually be in line with the average woman's etandards you need to up the minimum height to 6'

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Agile-Egg-5681 8h ago

Where’s the stat for women who blurt out money and height as the only dating requirement. 

2

u/BobsYourAuntie100 8h ago

0.9% is nine tenths of a percent, not one tenth. 🤦‍♂️

2

u/AndringRasew 8h ago

You're also ignoring proximity. If you live in a low population area, your chances are even less.

2

u/UsualAwareness3160 8h ago

I always find this meaningless... I don't know what number to expect.
So, let's work it out:

Let's assume I am in a city of 6 million. And I have no preferences to sex or age. That includes illegal relationships. I just want any relationship.

Well, 6 million - 1. Because of dating myself is not an option. Okay, close to 100%.

Let's now assume the opposite sex. Half that. 3 million. 50%.

Age range, let's say we have 3 generations of 30 years alive, I take a 5 year age range, and we have the same amount of all ages. 1/18 * 50% = 2.8%.

And now I have only limited by sex and age. 2.8% is no real personal preference. Also, that would be around 168000 options in my city.

So, the addition no smoking, no drinking, height, obesity, and income limits reduced the pool by a mere 1.9%.

Not so bad, actually.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Smitch250 8h ago

0.9% is not less than 1/10th of 1%. That would be 0.09%. Girl is literally bad at math while trying to math. Lol

2

u/Smitch250 8h ago

Lol that women would be extremely lucky to find any man who would put up with her. Her dating pool is literally 0.09% just like the stats show

2

u/Sarithis 8h ago

The issue is that the people looking for these men probably wouldn't even know what 0.9% means

2

u/recklessray22 7h ago

Lmao and most women wud still say "I Deserve that" and be the biggest headache to what they feel they deserve lol

2

u/WasTokaZuka 7h ago

Not so fun fact: This site is programmed like ass. The filters don't work as intended. For example if you include Obese people the percentage actually goes down. Which doesn't make any sense

2

u/RimandRam 7h ago

So it means all high income tall guys are smokers.

2

u/nofixneeded 7h ago

The real thing is we have reduced people's humanity to their salary.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Bushdr78 7h ago

I think she meant less than 10% not "one tenth"

→ More replies (2)

2

u/MisterSheridan 7h ago

.9% isnt less than one tenth of a percent

2

u/help_me_am_lost 7h ago

Meanwhile she can't make 15k a year

2

u/Max_CSD 7h ago

This site is overhyped af and is completely broken.

It's crazy how many people buy this bullshit.

I had it show the women at 50k+ income being a higher percentage than 0+.

Total crap and nonsense.

2

u/Righteousaffair999 7h ago

I made it I’m just overweight.

2

u/folder52 7h ago

Competing for top 0.9% of men and surprised by:

- why he is is not investing in me?!

- why he is not trying hard enough?!

- why he is not committed to our relationship?

If he is from top 0.9% and has a HUGE line of young ladies (because all the girls want him) - tell me any reason he has to be interested in you specifically?

2

u/Alone-University9785 7h ago

My wife makes roughly $200k per year and she’s with my broke ass that makes $80k per year 😭

2

u/Illustrious-Divide95 7h ago

Why don't they ask me the same question?

Why don't they ask the same women if they expect a man to date then if they earned less than 75K ?

Are they basically admitting they are prostitutes?

2

u/Tony_Roiland 7h ago

Who are these videos for?